Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Heart Rhythm. 2010 Sep;7(9):1255-62. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2010.06.019. Epub 2010 Jun 15.
The adjunctive role of dominant frequency (DF) mapping during complex fractionated electrogram (CFE) ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has not been clarified.
The purpose of this study was to investigate whether DF distribution or substrate properties are related to fibrillatory activity in the left atrium (LA) and to evaluate the effect of CFE ablation on the different patterns of DF distribution.
The study enrolled 50 nonparoxysmal AF patients who underwent mapping, pulmonary vein isolation, and CFE ablation. High-density DF and CFE mapping were performed from the center of DF(max) centrifugally to the rest of the LA. The LA substrate was classified into two types depending on the presence of intra-LA DF gradients as type 1 (>20% of the average DF) or type 2 (<20% of the average DF).
In type 1, maximal CFE and DF gradients were observed at the boundary (n = 14) or center (n = 16) of the DF(max) region. In type 2 (n = 20), less intra-LA DF gradient was observed (4.27 +/- 1.92 Hz vs 1.14 +/- 0.52 Hz for types 1 and 2, P <.001) and a large proportion of continuous CFEs extended from the center of DF(max) (19% +/- 11% and 42% +/- 15% of the LA for types 1 and type 2, P = .001). The procedure termination rate and long-term sinus rhythm maintenance rate were lower in patients with a smaller DF gradient (P <.05).
The spatial distribution of fractionated activity was associated with particular DF patterns in nonparoxysmal AF patients. Patients with an evident intra-LA DF gradient responded better to pulmonary vein isolation and continuous CFE ablation.
在房颤(AF)的复杂碎裂电图(CFE)消融中,主频(DF)映射的辅助作用尚未阐明。
本研究旨在探讨DF 分布或基质特性与左心房(LA)的纤维颤动活动是否相关,并评估 CFE 消融对不同 DF 分布模式的影响。
本研究纳入了 50 例非阵发性 AF 患者,他们接受了标测、肺静脉隔离和 CFE 消融。从 DF(max)的中心向 LA 的其余部分进行高密度 DF 和 CFE 标测。根据 LA 内 DF 梯度的存在,将 LA 基质分为两种类型:1 型(>平均 DF 的 20%)或 2 型(<平均 DF 的 20%)。
在 1 型中,最大 CFE 和 DF 梯度出现在 DF(max)区域的边界(n = 14)或中心(n = 16)。在 2 型(n = 20)中,观察到较少的 LA 内 DF 梯度(4.27 +/- 1.92 Hz 与 1.14 +/- 0.52 Hz,1 型和 2 型,P <.001),并且从 DF(max)的中心延伸的连续 CFE 的比例较大(19% +/- 11%和 42% +/- 15%的 LA,1 型和 2 型,P =.001)。DF 梯度较小的患者的手术终止率和长期窦性节律维持率较低(P <.05)。
在非阵发性 AF 患者中,碎裂活动的空间分布与特定的 DF 模式相关。具有明显 LA 内 DF 梯度的患者对肺静脉隔离和连续 CFE 消融反应更好。