Suppr超能文献

预测清醒镇静下内镜检查的患者耐受性。

Predicting patient tolerance of endoscopy with conscious sedation.

作者信息

Hazeldine Simon, Fritschi Lin, Forbes Geoff

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.

出版信息

Scand J Gastroenterol. 2010 Oct;45(10):1248-54. doi: 10.3109/00365521.2010.497939.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the adequacy of benzodiazepine/opiate sedation for endoscopic procedures and to identify patient and procedure characteristics that may predict poor procedural tolerance.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 2155 patients who underwent sedated gastroscopy, colonoscopy or flexible sigmoidoscopy between January and December 2007, participated in the prospective evaluation of procedural tolerance and the procedures were evaluated using three questionnaires completed by the patient, endoscopist and assisting nurse. Perception of procedural tolerance was scored using a 100-point visual analog scale (VAS), 0: very good to 100: very poorly. In order to identify patient and procedure characteristics predictive of poor procedural tolerance, we compared 10% of patients who tolerated the procedure least well with the remaining patients.

RESULTS

About 216 (10%) of 2155 patients gave a VAS score of >30, and were compared with the 1939 patients with a VAS <30. Patients who tolerated the procedure least well (VAS ≥30) were more likely female [odds ratio (OR) 2.8, 95% confidence interval 1.9-4.1], had colonoscopy (OR 2.9, 1.8-4.5) or had a training endoscopist perform the procedure (OR 3.2, 2.2-4.8). Patients with BMI ≥35 were also more likely to have a VAS ≥30 (p < 0.01). Sedation type and American Society of Anesthesiologists grade had no significant effect on patient tolerance.

CONCLUSIONS

A majority of patients tolerate endoscopic procedures well when benzodiazepine/opiate sedation is used. Accurately identifying the minority who tolerate these procedures less well remains difficult.

摘要

目的

评估苯二氮䓬类/阿片类药物镇静用于内镜检查的充分性,并确定可能预测操作耐受性差的患者和操作特征。

材料与方法

共有2155例在2007年1月至12月期间接受镇静胃镜检查、结肠镜检查或乙状结肠镜检查的患者参与了操作耐受性的前瞻性评估,这些操作通过患者、内镜医师和辅助护士填写的三份问卷进行评估。使用100分视觉模拟量表(VAS)对操作耐受性进行评分,0分表示非常好,100分表示非常差。为了确定预测操作耐受性差的患者和操作特征,我们将操作耐受性最差的10%患者与其余患者进行了比较。

结果

2155例患者中约216例(10%)的VAS评分>30,并与1939例VAS<30的患者进行了比较。操作耐受性最差(VAS≥30)的患者更可能为女性[比值比(OR)2.8,95%置信区间1.9 - 4.1],接受结肠镜检查(OR 2.9,1.8 - 4.5)或由实习内镜医师进行操作(OR 3.2,2.2 - 4.8)。BMI≥35的患者也更可能VAS≥30(p<0.01)。镇静类型和美国麻醉医师协会分级对患者耐受性无显著影响。

结论

使用苯二氮䓬类/阿片类药物镇静时,大多数患者对内镜检查耐受性良好。准确识别耐受性较差的少数患者仍然困难。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验