Meng Ying-Ying, Pourat Nadereh, Cosway Robert, Kominski Gerald F
UCLA Center for Health Policy Research, Los Angeles, California 90024, USA.
J Asthma. 2010 Jun;47(5):581-6. doi: 10.3109/02770901003753314.
The California Legislature requires health maintenance organizations (HMOs) to expand coverage for pediatric asthma self-management educational services under two scenarios: education in clinic settings (to include group education) for symptomatic children; education in clinic and community settings (to include home- or school-based education) for children with uncontrolled asthma. Objective. This study aims to determine the impacts of the bill on coverage, utilization, and costs.
The study population includes 503,000 children ages 1-17 years with symptomatic asthma and 134,000 children with uncontrolled asthma insured by California HMOs. The net effects of the expansion of coverage on costs were estimated after factoring in both the new costs associated with increases in utilization of expanded asthma self-management education as well as the cost savings resulting from reduced asthma-related emergency room visits and hospitalizations.
All children enrolled in HMOs in California are covered for clinic-based individual asthma self-management education, though alternative methods, such as group health education classes, and home- or school-based education services are less frequently or not covered at all by HMOs. The cost estimate for expansion of clinic-based education services to children with symptomatic asthma was approximately $5 million; and expansion of clinic and community-based education services to children with uncontrolled asthma was approximately $1 million annually if utilization increased by 10%.
Our findings suggest that expansion of coverage for pediatric asthma self-management education is not very costly, especially for children with uncontrolled asthma given the potential improvements in asthma outcomes. Further evaluation of feasibility for implementation of community-based education is needed.
加利福尼亚州立法机构要求健康维护组织(HMOs)在两种情况下扩大对儿童哮喘自我管理教育服务的覆盖范围:为有症状的儿童在诊所环境中提供教育(包括团体教育);为哮喘未得到控制的儿童在诊所和社区环境中提供教育(包括基于家庭或学校的教育)。目的。本研究旨在确定该法案对覆盖范围、利用率和成本的影响。
研究人群包括由加利福尼亚州HMOs承保的50.3万名1至17岁有症状哮喘儿童和13.4万名哮喘未得到控制的儿童。在考虑到与扩大哮喘自我管理教育利用率增加相关的新成本以及因哮喘相关急诊室就诊和住院减少而产生的成本节约后,估计了覆盖范围扩大对成本的净影响。
加利福尼亚州所有参加HMOs的儿童都能获得基于诊所的个体哮喘自我管理教育,不过HMOs较少或根本不覆盖其他方法,如团体健康教育课程以及基于家庭或学校的教育服务。将基于诊所的教育服务扩展到有症状哮喘儿童的成本估计约为500万美元;如果利用率提高10%,将基于诊所和社区的教育服务扩展到哮喘未得到控制的儿童每年约为100万美元。
我们的研究结果表明,扩大儿童哮喘自我管理教育的覆盖范围成本不高,特别是对于哮喘未得到控制的儿童,因为这可能改善哮喘治疗效果。需要进一步评估实施基于社区教育的可行性。