• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

动力式经内镜鼻腔泪囊吻合术联合选择性支架置入术。

Powered endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy with selective stenting.

机构信息

Otorhinolaryngology Department, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.

出版信息

Laryngoscope. 2010 Jul;120(7):1449-52. doi: 10.1002/lary.20916.

DOI:10.1002/lary.20916
PMID:20564733
Abstract

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: To compare surgical outcomes of primary powered endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) with selective or routine silicone stenting in anatomic and functional nasolacrimal duct obstruction (NLDO).

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective nonrandomized cohort study with historical control group.

METHODS

Thirty-one consecutive primary powered endoscopic DCR procedures with selective stenting were performed for anatomic or functional NLDO. No stenting was used unless a tight Rosenmuller valve was appreciated when probing nasolacrimal system during surgery. Nasolacrimal system irrigation, dacryocystography, and lacrimal scintigraphy were used for preoperative assessment. Success was defined as absence of symptoms and patent nasolacrimal system. Comparisons were made with a historical cohort of 31 consecutive primary powered endoscopic DCR procedures with routine stenting.

RESULTS

The overall success rate was 79% (49/62), with 96.3% (26/27) success for anatomic and 65.7% (23/35) for functional NLDO. Success rates for anatomic NLDO were 100% (8/8) with selective stenting and 94.7% (18/19) with routine stenting (P > .05). Success rates for functional NLDO were 60.9% (14/23) with selective stenting and 75% (9/12) with routine stenting (P > .05). In the selective stenting group, 2/8 of the anatomic obstructions and 8/23 of the functional obstructions required stents.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggests that there is no difference in surgical outcomes of primary powered endoscopic DCR with selective or routine stenting in both anatomic and functional NLDO. We advocate a selective stenting approach for primary endoscopic DCR, whereby stents are only inserted when a tight common canaliculus opening is found during surgery.

摘要

目的/假设:比较原发性动力内镜下鼻内泪囊吻合术(DCR)在解剖学和功能性鼻泪管阻塞(NLDO)中选择性或常规硅胶支架置入的手术效果。

研究设计

前瞻性非随机队列研究,有历史对照组。

方法

对 31 例原发性动力内镜下 DCR 行选择性支架置入术治疗解剖学或功能性 NLDO。只有在术中探查鼻泪管系统时发现泪小管开口狭窄时才使用支架,否则不使用支架。术前评估采用泪道冲洗、泪囊造影和泪液闪烁显像。成功定义为无症状和鼻泪管通畅。与 31 例原发性动力内镜下 DCR 常规支架置入术的历史队列进行比较。

结果

总成功率为 79%(49/62),解剖学成功率为 96.3%(26/27),功能性成功率为 65.7%(23/35)。选择性支架置入的解剖学 NLDO 成功率为 100%(8/8),常规支架置入的成功率为 94.7%(18/19)(P >.05)。选择性支架置入的功能性 NLDO 成功率为 60.9%(14/23),常规支架置入的成功率为 75%(9/12)(P >.05)。在选择性支架置入组中,8 例解剖学阻塞中有 2 例和 23 例功能性阻塞中有 8 例需要支架。

结论

我们的研究表明,原发性动力内镜下 DCR 选择性或常规支架置入在解剖学和功能性 NLDO 中的手术效果无差异。我们主张对原发性内镜 DCR 采用选择性支架置入方法,只有在术中发现泪小管开口狭窄时才插入支架。

相似文献

1
Powered endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy with selective stenting.动力式经内镜鼻腔泪囊吻合术联合选择性支架置入术。
Laryngoscope. 2010 Jul;120(7):1449-52. doi: 10.1002/lary.20916.
2
External versus endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy for acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction in a tertiary referral center.在一家三级转诊中心,比较外路与内镜下泪囊鼻腔造口术治疗后天性鼻泪管阻塞的效果
Ophthalmology. 2005 Aug;112(8):1463-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2005.03.015.
3
Endocanalicular laser dacryocystorhinostomy analysis of 118 consecutive surgeries.118例连续泪道激光泪囊鼻腔吻合术分析
Ophthalmology. 2005 Sep;112(9):1629-33. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2005.04.015.
4
Powered endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy with mucosal flaps without stenting.带黏膜瓣无支架动力内镜下泪囊鼻腔造口术
Med J Malaysia. 2008 Aug;63(3):237-8.
5
Primary treatment of acute dacryocystitis by endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy with silicone intubation guided by a soft probe.软性探头引导下硅胶管置入的内镜下泪囊鼻腔造口术治疗急性泪囊炎的初步研究
Ophthalmology. 2009 Jan;116(1):116-22. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.09.041.
6
Symptom score questionnaire for nasolacrimal duct obstruction in adults--a novel tool to assess the outcome after endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy.成人鼻泪管阻塞症状评分问卷-一种评估内镜下鼻内泪囊吻合术疗效的新工具。
Rhinology. 2010 Dec;48(4):446-51. doi: 10.4193/Rhino10.069.
7
Lacrimal drainage obstruction and dacryocystorhinostomy in children.儿童泪道阻塞与泪囊鼻腔吻合术
Eye (Lond). 2008 Jul;22(7):918-24. doi: 10.1038/sj.eye.6702769. Epub 2007 Mar 16.
8
Nonlaser endoscopic endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy with adjunctive mitomycin C in nasolacrimal duct obstruction in adults.非激光经鼻内镜下鼻腔泪囊吻合术联合丝裂霉素 C 治疗成人鼻泪管阻塞。
Ophthalmology. 2010 May;117(5):1037-40. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.09.028. Epub 2010 Jan 15.
9
Endoscopic radiofrequency-assisted dacryocystorhinostomy with double stent: a personal experience.内镜下射频辅助双支架泪囊鼻腔造口术:个人经验
Orbit. 2005 Mar;24(1):15-22. doi: 10.1080/01676830590890864.
10
Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy without silicone stent.无硅胶支架的内镜下泪囊鼻腔造口术
Acta Otolaryngol. 2012 Jun;132 Suppl 1:S77-81. doi: 10.3109/00016489.2012.659754. Epub 2012 Mar 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Interventions in functional epiphora-a systematic review.功能性溢泪的干预措施——一项系统评价
Int J Ophthalmol. 2025 May 18;18(5):937-950. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2025.05.21. eCollection 2025.
2
Long-term outcomes of laser dacryoplasty combined with intubation using a new silicon tube in patients with lacrimal duct obstruction.新型硅胶管置入联合激光泪囊成形术治疗泪道阻塞患者的长期疗效
Int J Ophthalmol. 2023 Sep 18;16(9):1475-1481. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2023.09.14. eCollection 2023.
3
Should Silicone Lacrimal Stenting be a Better Choice for Primary Endoscopic Powered Dacryocystorhinostomy?
硅胶泪道支架对于原发性内镜动力性泪囊鼻腔造口术来说是否是更好的选择?
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2023 Jun;75(2):496-502. doi: 10.1007/s12070-022-03299-4. Epub 2022 Dec 11.
4
Endonasal Endoscopic Dacryocystorhinostomy with and Without Stents-A Comparative Study.带支架与不带支架的鼻内镜下泪囊鼻腔造口术——一项对比研究
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2022 Oct;74(Suppl 2):1433-1441. doi: 10.1007/s12070-021-02561-5. Epub 2021 May 1.
5
Endoscopic DCR: A 10 Years Personal Experience.内镜下泪囊鼻腔造口术:10年个人经验
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2019 Nov;71(Suppl 3):2039-2043. doi: 10.1007/s12070-018-1458-5. Epub 2018 Jul 23.
6
Comparison of balloon dacryocystorhinostomy with conventional endonasal endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy for relief of acquired distal nasolacrimal drainage obstruction and its impact on quality of life: A prospective, randomized, controlled study.球囊泪囊鼻腔造口术与传统鼻内镜下泪囊鼻腔造口术治疗后天性鼻泪管远端阻塞的疗效比较及其对生活质量的影响:一项前瞻性、随机、对照研究。
Med J Armed Forces India. 2018 Jul;74(3):255-263. doi: 10.1016/j.mjafi.2017.08.010. Epub 2017 Oct 29.
7
A Systematic Review of Benefit of Silicone Intubation in Endoscopic Dacryocystorhinostomy.硅胶插管在内镜下泪囊鼻腔造口术中益处的系统评价
Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol. 2018 Jun;11(2):81-88. doi: 10.21053/ceo.2018.00031. Epub 2018 Apr 14.
8
Comprehensive review on endonasal endoscopic sinus surgery.鼻内镜鼻窦手术综合综述
GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015 Dec 22;14:Doc08. doi: 10.3205/cto000123. eCollection 2015.
9
Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy with and without silicone intubation: 4 years retrospective study.有或无硅胶插管的内镜下泪囊鼻腔造口术:4年回顾性研究
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2016 Aug;273(8):2079-84. doi: 10.1007/s00405-015-3876-2. Epub 2016 Jan 5.
10
Posterior lacrimal sac approach technique without stenting in endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy.内镜下泪囊鼻腔造口术中无支架置入的泪囊后入路技术
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2013 Oct;33(5):324-8.