Kumar Saravana, Grimmer-Somers Karen, Hughes Bernard
International Centre for Allied Health Evidence, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Physiother Res Int. 2010 Jun;15(2):96-102. doi: 10.1002/pri.479.
Evidence based practice is increasingly mandated by all stakeholders as an integral process of ensuring safe and quality health care. It is recognised that evidence based practice can contribute to minimising misuse, overuse and underuse of health care. Operationalising evidence based practice requires physiotherapists to access relevant evidence, appraise the evidence for its methodological quality, extract information relevant to their practice, and implement it as part of health care service delivery. The final step in this process is to evaluate evidence implementation and reflect what, if any, changes to health care processes and outcomes was achieved. From a theoretical perspective, these steps seem logical and readily achievable. However, practical application in clinical practice settings has encountered numerous barriers. One such barrier, which is commonly encountered and is a contentious area, is the issue of ethics in evidence implementation. Using two hypothetical case studies, we aim to highlight common frustrations encountered by physiotherapists when implementing evidence into practice, ethical ambiguity underpinning evidence implementation and discuss implications in terms of clinical practice and research.
循证实践越来越受到所有利益相关者的强制要求,成为确保医疗保健安全和质量的一个不可或缺的过程。人们认识到,循证实践有助于最大限度地减少医疗保健的误用、过度使用和使用不足。实施循证实践要求物理治疗师获取相关证据,评估证据的方法学质量,提取与其实践相关的信息,并将其作为医疗服务提供的一部分加以实施。这一过程的最后一步是评估证据的实施情况,并反映医疗保健过程和结果是否实现了任何变化。从理论角度来看,这些步骤似乎合乎逻辑且易于实现。然而,在临床实践环境中的实际应用遇到了许多障碍。其中一个常见且有争议的障碍是证据实施中的伦理问题。通过两个假设的案例研究,我们旨在突出物理治疗师在将证据应用于实践时遇到的常见挫折、证据实施背后的伦理模糊性,并讨论其在临床实践和研究方面的影响。