• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

信任、关系评价的可变性与关系过程。

Trust, variability in relationship evaluations, and relationship processes.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, The University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

J Pers Soc Psychol. 2010 Jul;99(1):14-31. doi: 10.1037/a0019714.

DOI:10.1037/a0019714
PMID:20565183
Abstract

Little is known about why some people experience greater temporal fluctuations of relationship perceptions over short periods of time, or how these fluctuations within individuals are associated with relational processes that can destabilize relationships. Two studies were conducted to address these questions. In Study 1, long-term dating partners completed a 14-day diary study that assessed each partner's daily partner and relationship perceptions. Following the diary phase, each couple was videotaped trying to resolve the most important unresolved problem from the diary period. As predicted, (a) individuals who trusted their partners less reported greater variability in perceptions of relationship quality across the diary period; (b) they also perceived daily relationship-based conflict as a relatively more negative experience; and (c) greater variability in relationship perceptions predicted greater self-reported distress, more negative behavior, and less positive behavior during a postdiary conflict resolution task (rated by observers). The diary results were conceptually replicated in Study 2a, in which older cohabiting couples completed a 21-day diary. These same participants also took part in a reaction-time decision-making study (Study 2b), which revealed that individuals tend to compartmentalize positive and negative features of their partners if they (individuals) experienced greater variability in relationship quality during the 21-day diary period and were involved in higher quality relationships. These findings advance researchers' understanding of trust in intimate relationships and provide some insight into how temporal fluctuations in relationship quality may undermine relationships.

摘要

目前人们对于为什么有些人在短时间内经历更大的关系感知波动,或者这些个体内部的波动如何与可能破坏关系的关系过程相关知之甚少。进行了两项研究来解决这些问题。在研究 1 中,长期约会伴侣完成了一项为期 14 天的日记研究,评估了每个伴侣的日常伴侣和关系感知。在日记阶段之后,每对夫妇都被拍摄下来,试图解决日记期间未解决的最重要问题。正如预测的那样,(a)不太信任伴侣的人报告称,在整个日记期间,对关系质量的感知变化更大;(b)他们还将日常基于关系的冲突视为相对更负面的体验;(c)关系感知的更大变化预测了在日记后解决冲突任务(由观察者评定)中自我报告的更多困扰、更多负面行为和更少积极行为。在研究 2a 中,对同居的老年夫妇进行了为期 21 天的日记研究,对日记结果进行了概念验证。这些相同的参与者还参加了一项反应时间决策研究(研究 2b),该研究表明,如果个体在 21 天的日记期间经历了更大的关系质量变化并且处于更高质量的关系中,他们往往会将伴侣的积极和消极特征分开。这些发现增进了研究人员对亲密关系中信任的理解,并为关系质量的时间波动如何可能破坏关系提供了一些见解。

相似文献

1
Trust, variability in relationship evaluations, and relationship processes.信任、关系评价的可变性与关系过程。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2010 Jul;99(1):14-31. doi: 10.1037/a0019714.
2
Perceptions of conflict and support in romantic relationships: the role of attachment anxiety.浪漫关系中对冲突和支持的认知:依恋焦虑的作用。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2005 Mar;88(3):510-31. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.88.3.510.
3
The importance of the organization of partner knowledge in understanding perceptions of relationship quality and conflict resolution behavior in married couples.伴侣知识的组织在理解已婚夫妇对关系质量的认知以及冲突解决行为方面的重要性。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2008 Jun;34(6):723-40. doi: 10.1177/0146167208315355. Epub 2008 Apr 14.
4
When is being known or adored by romantic partners most beneficial? Self-perceptions, relationship length, and responses to partner's verifying and enhancing appraisals.在什么时候被浪漫伴侣了解或爱慕最为有益?自我认知、恋爱时长以及对伴侣确认和强化性评价的反应。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2006 Oct;32(10):1283-94. doi: 10.1177/0146167206290383.
5
Qualitative reports of problems in cohabiting relationships: comparisons to married and dating relationships.同居关系中问题的定性报告:与婚姻关系和约会关系的比较。
J Fam Psychol. 2009 Apr;23(2):236-46. doi: 10.1037/a0015364.
6
Gender, topic, and time in observed demand-withdraw interaction in cross- and same-sex couples.观察到的异性恋和同性恋伴侣中需求-回避互动中的性别、话题和时间。
J Fam Psychol. 2010 Jun;24(3):233-42. doi: 10.1037/a0019717.
7
Regulating partners in intimate relationships: the costs and benefits of different communication strategies.调节亲密关系中的伴侣:不同沟通策略的成本与收益
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2009 Mar;96(3):620-39. doi: 10.1037/a0012961.
8
Giving up and giving in: the costs and benefits of daily sacrifice in intimate relationships.放弃与屈服:亲密关系中日常牺牲的成本与收益
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2005 Sep;89(3):327-44. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.89.3.327.
9
Family pediatrics: report of the Task Force on the Family.家庭儿科学:家庭问题特别工作组报告
Pediatrics. 2003 Jun;111(6 Pt 2):1541-71.
10
Interpersonal predictors of stress generation.压力产生的人际预测因素。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2009 May;35(5):544-56. doi: 10.1177/0146167208329857. Epub 2009 Jan 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Loneliness is associated with unstable and distorted emotion transition predictions.孤独与不稳定且扭曲的情绪转换预测有关。
Commun Psychol. 2025 Aug 28;3(1):132. doi: 10.1038/s44271-025-00310-w.
2
The ill fortune of attachment insecurity and dyadic distrust in marital satisfaction: a dyadic perspective in Turkish couples.婚姻满意度中依恋不安全感和二元不信任的不幸:土耳其夫妻的二元视角
BMC Psychol. 2025 Apr 22;13(1):417. doi: 10.1186/s40359-025-02719-8.
3
Core dimensions of intimate relationship quality: Network analyses from the prenatal to postnatal period.
亲密关系质量的核心维度:从孕期到产后阶段的网络分析
J Fam Psychol. 2025 Aug;39(5):614-626. doi: 10.1037/fam0001338. Epub 2025 Apr 10.
4
Fairness, Trust, and Well-Being Among Young Adults: Evidence from 2021 Chinese General Social Survey (CGSS).青年成年人中的公平、信任与幸福感:来自2021年中国综合社会调查(CGSS)的证据
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Nov 3;12(21):2186. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12212186.
5
The Good, the Bad, and the Variable: Examining Stress and Blood Pressure Responses to Close Relationships.善、恶与变量:探究亲密关系中的压力及血压反应
Soc Psychol Personal Sci. 2024 Apr;15(3):288-298. doi: 10.1177/19485506231156018. Epub 2023 Mar 27.
6
Variation in emotion dynamics over time is associated with future relationship outcomes.情绪动态随时间的变化与未来的人际关系结果相关。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2024 Mar 28;18:1331859. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2024.1331859. eCollection 2024.
7
Trust in relationships: a preliminary investigation of the influence of parental divorce, breakup experiences, adult attachment style, and close relationship beliefs on dyadic trust.关系中的信任:关于父母离异、分手经历、成人依恋风格以及亲密关系信念对二元信任影响的初步调查。
Front Psychol. 2023 Nov 2;14:1260480. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1260480. eCollection 2023.
8
Predictors of Individual and Interpersonal Adjustment Among Non-offending Partners of Individuals With Histories of Sexual Offenses.有性犯罪史者的非犯罪伴侣中个人及人际适应的预测因素
Sex Abuse. 2025 Feb;37(1):58-87. doi: 10.1177/10790632231213832. Epub 2023 Nov 11.
9
Here one time, gone the next: Fluctuations in support received and provided predict changes in relationship satisfaction across the transition to parenthood.一时在这里,一时又不在:在向为人父母的过渡阶段,收到和提供的支持的波动预测了关系满意度的变化。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2023 May;124(5):971-1000. doi: 10.1037/pspi0000408. Epub 2022 Nov 10.
10
Women and Men are the Barometers of Relationships: Testing the Predictive Power of Women's and Men's Relationship Satisfaction.男女是关系的晴雨表:检验女性和男性关系满意度的预测能力。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Aug 16;119(33):e2209460119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2209460119. Epub 2022 Aug 8.