Campbell Lorne, Simpson Jeffry A, Boldry Jennifer, Kashy Deborah A
Department of Psychology, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada.
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2005 Mar;88(3):510-31. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.88.3.510.
Guided by attachment theory, a 2-part study was conducted to test how perceptions of relationship-based conflict and support are associated with relationship satisfaction/closeness and future quality. Dating partners completed diaries for 14 days (Part 1) and then were videotaped while discussing a major problem that occurred during the diary study (Part 2). Part 1 reveals that more anxiously attached individuals perceived more conflict with their dating partners and reported a tendency for conflicts to escalate in severity. Perceptions of daily relationship-based conflicts negatively impacted the perceived satisfaction/closeness and relationship futures of highly anxious individuals, whereas perceptions of greater daily support had positive effects. Part 2 reveals that highly anxious individuals appeared more distressed and escalated the severity of conflicts (rated by observers) and reported feeling more distressed. The authors discuss the unique features of attachment anxiety and how changing perceptions of relationship satisfaction/closeness and stability could erode commitment over time.
在依恋理论的指导下,开展了一项分为两部分的研究,以测试基于关系的冲突和支持认知如何与关系满意度/亲密度以及未来关系质量相关联。约会伴侣记录了14天的日记(第一部分),然后在讨论日记研究期间出现的一个主要问题时进行了录像(第二部分)。第一部分显示,焦虑依恋程度更高的个体察觉到与约会伴侣的冲突更多,并且报告称冲突有升级加剧的趋势。对基于日常关系的冲突的认知对高度焦虑个体的关系满意度/亲密度以及关系未来产生了负面影响,而对更多日常支持的认知则有积极影响。第二部分显示,高度焦虑的个体看起来更加苦恼,冲突的严重程度升级(由观察者评定),并且报告称感觉更加苦恼。作者讨论了依恋焦虑的独特特征,以及随着时间推移,关系满意度/亲密度和稳定性认知的变化如何可能侵蚀承诺。