• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Effects of participant preferences in unblinded randomized controlled trials.

作者信息

Floyd Anna H L, Moyer Anne

机构信息

Klein Buendel, Inc., 1667 Cole Boulevard, Suite 225, Golden, CO 80401, USA.

出版信息

J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2010 Jun;5(2):81-93. doi: 10.1525/jer.2010.5.2.81.

DOI:10.1525/jer.2010.5.2.81
PMID:20569152
Abstract

Little research has deliberately investigated the effects of participant preferences for treatment condition in unblinded randomized controlled trials. We designed a study with a non-patient sample comparing a randomized arm to a preference arm of the same trial to investigate: (1) whether having a choice to select one's preference affects feelings about participation, belief in treatment effectiveness, treatment contamination, intervention adherence and engagement, and trial attrition; and (2) the interaction of preferences and treatment assignment on these variables. Contamination and attrition were rare and excluded from analyses. There was no effect of choice. Participants mismatched to preference felt less positive about their experience, but this did not affect belief in treatment, adherence, or engagement. Stronger effects may occur for patient populations.

摘要

相似文献

1
Effects of participant preferences in unblinded randomized controlled trials.
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2010 Jun;5(2):81-93. doi: 10.1525/jer.2010.5.2.81.
2
Influence of treatment preferences on validity: a review.治疗偏好对效度的影响:一项综述。
Can J Nurs Res. 2009 Dec;41(4):52-67.
3
Can clinical trials requiring frequent participant contact be conducted over the Internet? Results from an online randomized controlled trial evaluating a topical ointment for herpes labialis.需要频繁与参与者联系的临床试验能否通过互联网进行?一项评估治疗唇疱疹外用软膏的在线随机对照试验的结果。
J Med Internet Res. 2004 Feb 17;6(1):e6. doi: 10.2196/jmir.6.1.e6.
4
A conundrum for randomized controlled trials: experience from a small hepatocellular carcinoma trial.随机对照试验的难题:来自一项小肝癌试验的经验。
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2010 Oct;40(10):949-53. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyq074. Epub 2010 May 21.
5
An exploration of participants' treatment preferences in a partial RCT.在一项部分随机对照试验中对参与者治疗偏好的探索。
Can J Nurs Res. 2004 Sep;36(3):100-14.
6
Challenges in the design of a Home Telemanagement trial for patients with ulcerative colitis.溃疡性结肠炎患者家庭远程管理试验设计中的挑战。
Clin Trials. 2009 Dec;6(6):649-57. doi: 10.1177/1740774509346978. Epub 2009 Oct 12.
7
Investigating patient exclusion bias in meta-analysis.调查荟萃分析中的患者排除偏倚。
Int J Epidemiol. 2005 Feb;34(1):79-87. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyh300. Epub 2004 Nov 23.
8
Design of cluster-randomized trials of quality improvement interventions aimed at medical care providers.针对医疗服务提供者的质量改进干预措施的整群随机试验设计。
Med Care. 2007 Oct;45(10 Supl 2):S38-43. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e318070c0a0.
9
Optimal allocation of participants for the estimation of selection, preference and treatment effects in the two-stage randomised trial design.两阶段随机试验设计中选择、偏好和治疗效果估计的最优参与者分配。
Stat Med. 2012 Jun 15;31(13):1307-22. doi: 10.1002/sim.4486. Epub 2012 Feb 23.
10
Physical activity in women receiving chemotherapy for breast cancer: adherence to a walking intervention.接受乳腺癌化疗的女性的身体活动:对步行干预的依从性。
Oncol Nurs Forum. 2010 May;37(3):321-30. doi: 10.1188/10.ONF.321-330.

引用本文的文献

1
Adapting Cognitive Remediation Group Therapy Online: Focus Groups with People Aging with HIV.适应认知矫正团体治疗在线模式:与艾滋病毒感染者老年人群体的焦点小组
J Int Assoc Provid AIDS Care. 2024 Jan-Dec;23:23259582241242703. doi: 10.1177/23259582241242703.
2
The importance of reminders and patient preferences to improve inhaler technique in older adults with COPD.提醒和患者偏好对改善慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)老年患者吸入器技术的重要性。
Front Pharmacol. 2023 Jan 4;13:989362. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.989362. eCollection 2022.
3
Counting on U training to enhance trusting relationships and mental health literacy among business advisors: protocol for a randomised controlled trial.
依托 U 培训增强商业顾问之间的信任关系和心理健康素养:一项随机对照试验方案。
BMC Psychiatry. 2022 Jun 15;22(1):400. doi: 10.1186/s12888-022-04034-7.
4
The Impact of Matching to Psychotherapy Preference on Engagement in a Randomized Controlled Trial for Patients With Advanced Cancer.在一项针对晚期癌症患者的随机对照试验中,匹配心理治疗偏好对参与度的影响。
Front Psychol. 2021 Feb 24;12:637519. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.637519. eCollection 2021.
5
Participant outcomes and preferences in Alzheimer's disease clinical trials: The electronic Person-Specific Outcome Measure (ePSOM) development program.阿尔茨海默病临床试验中的参与者结局与偏好:电子个性化结局测量(ePSOM)开发项目。
Alzheimers Dement (N Y). 2018 Dec 12;4:694-702. doi: 10.1016/j.trci.2018.10.013. eCollection 2018.
6
Estimation of treatment preference effects in clinical trials when some participants are indifferent to treatment choice.当部分参与者对治疗选择无差异时,在临床试验中估计治疗偏好效应。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2017 Feb 20;17(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s12874-017-0304-x.
7
Subversive subjects: rule-breaking and deception in clinical trials.颠覆性受试者:临床试验中的违规与欺骗行为
J Law Med Ethics. 2013 Winter;41(4):829-40, Table of Contents. doi: 10.1111/jlme.12093.
8
Understanding patient values and the manifestations in clinical research with traditional chinese medicine-with practical suggestions for trial design and implementation.理解患者价值观与中医临床研究表现——兼论临床试验设计与实施的实用建议。
Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2013;2013:847273. doi: 10.1155/2013/847273. Epub 2013 Dec 2.
9
Do participants' preferences for mode of delivery (text, video, or both) influence the effectiveness of a Web-based physical activity intervention?参与者对交付方式(文本、视频或两者皆有)的偏好是否会影响基于网络的体育活动干预的效果?
J Med Internet Res. 2012 Feb 29;14(1):e37. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1998.