Rösing C, Trinkl W, Rösing K, Gebhardt B
Medizinische Klinik-Gastroenterologie, Kreiskrankenhaus Waldbröl.
Med Klin (Munich). 1991 Apr 15;86(4):190-3.
In a prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, clinical study of 129 consecutive patients examined by one experienced endoscopist, we compared two premedication schedules: midazolam plus placebo and midazolam plus ketamine. 40% of the patients receiving midazolam alone needed a second injection, and 15% had to be excluded for failure. In the ketamine-group, 27% received a second injection; there were no treatment failures. The combination of both drugs proved to be safe without added risk. The combination provides more reliable sedation and analgesia and is judged as superior by the endoscopist, and patient's acceptance for re-endoscopy is higher.
在一项前瞻性、双盲、安慰剂对照、平行组的临床研究中,由一位经验丰富的内镜医师对129例连续患者进行检查,我们比较了两种术前用药方案:咪达唑仑加安慰剂和咪达唑仑加氯胺酮。仅接受咪达唑仑治疗的患者中有40%需要第二次注射,15%因治疗失败而被排除。在氯胺酮组中,27%的患者接受了第二次注射;没有治疗失败的情况。两种药物联合使用被证明是安全的,没有额外风险。联合用药提供了更可靠的镇静和镇痛效果,内镜医师认为其更优越,患者对再次内镜检查的接受度更高。