A description of the findings from bull breeding soundness evaluations and their association with pregnancy outcomes in a study of western Canadian beef herds.

The primary objectives were to describe beef bulls considered for use and those reported as used in 205 beef herds in western Canada, and to determine whether factors typically assessed during breeding soundness evaluations were associated with reproductive success. More than 100 veterinary clinics reported 2990 breeding soundness evaluations for bulls considered for natural service in client's herds. Differences among clinics explained 5.2% of the variation in scrotal circumference (SC) and 6.9% of the variation in percentage of morphologically normal sperm of all bulls considered for use (after accounting for age, breed, body condition, significant physical abnormalities, month, and year). The percentage of morphologically normal sperm was lower in bulls with an SC <or=34 versus >34 cm (P < 0.006). This study included data from 1384 and 1370 bulls used for breeding in 2001 and 2002, respectively. Most (80%) of the bulls used were Simmental, Black Angus, Charolais, Red Angus, or Hereford, and 80% were <or=4 y of age. Before the breeding season, a veterinarian evaluated 89.5% of all bulls used in these herds. Of the bulls subjected to a breeding soundness evaluation and subsequently used, 93.1% were satisfactory. In 2001 and 2002, injuries were reported in 2.5 and 2.1% of bulls and in 16.6 and 11.4% of herds, and necrobacillosis of the foot was reported in 2.5 and 1.2% of bulls and 11.2 and 6.5% of the herds. The average number of cows exposed to each bull was 26 (both years). Cows exposed to bulls with a smaller SC were less likely to be diagnosed pregnant (P < 0.047) and had a longer median interval from first bull exposure to calving (P < 0.016) than bulls with a larger SC. In conclusion, our findings emphasized the value of breeding soundness evaluations, including measurements of SC, in fertility management of beef cattle.