Suppr超能文献

肾素-血管紧张素-醛固酮抑制剂降低门脉压:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone inhibitors in the reduction of portal pressure: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Hospital Clinic, Liver Unit, Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

J Hepatol. 2010 Aug;53(2):273-82. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2010.03.013. Epub 2010 May 21.

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone antagonists [ACE inhibitors (ACEi), angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB), aldosterone antagonists (AA)] are potential therapies for portal hypertension. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of RAAS inhibitors in hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) reduction.

METHODS

We included full-text controlled trials in patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension. The primary outcome was mean change in HVPG between treatment and control. Two independent reviewers performed trial selection and quality assessment. An individual patient meta-analysis based on the data of three studies was performed.

RESULTS

From 193 citations, 19 controlled trials (n=678) were included. When compared to placebo, ARB/ACEi resulted in significant HVPG reduction. The best quality trials compared ARB/ACEi to beta-blockers (BB). Pooled individual patient data for three of four of these trials showed that BB decreased the HVPG more than ARB/ACEi. In patients with Child Pugh A cirrhosis, the HVPG reduction with ARB/ACEi (-17%; 95% CI: -28 to -6), was similar to that of BB (-21%; 95% CI: -32 to -9). Significant variation in the comparison groups of AA trials precluded pooling. There was no difference in adverse events in any group but selected studies noted adverse hemodynamic effects in decompensated patients on ARB/ACEi.

CONCLUSIONS

ARB/ACEi reduce portal pressure in patients with Child Pugh A cirrhosis without adverse events. The efficacy and safety in this group may be secondary to a targeted effect on the local hepatic RAAS system, as compared to decompensated patients who risk hypotension and renal insufficiency due to activation of the systemic RAAS. Further studies should determine the potential of these drugs as an alternative or adjunct to BB.

摘要

背景与目的

肾素-血管紧张素-醛固酮拮抗剂(ACEI、ARB、醛固酮拮抗剂)是门静脉高压的潜在治疗方法。我们评估了 RAAS 抑制剂在肝静脉压力梯度(HVPG)降低方面的疗效和安全性。

方法

我们纳入了肝硬化和门静脉高压患者的全文对照试验。主要结局是治疗与对照之间 HVPG 的平均变化。两名独立审查员进行了试验选择和质量评估。基于三项研究的数据进行了个体患者荟萃分析。

结果

从 193 条引文中共纳入了 19 项对照试验(n=678)。与安慰剂相比,ARB/ACEI 可显著降低 HVPG。质量最好的试验将 ARB/ACEI 与β受体阻滞剂(BB)进行了比较。这四项试验中的三项的汇总个体患者数据显示,BB 降低 HVPG 的效果优于 ARB/ACEI。在 Child-Pugh A 级肝硬化患者中,ARB/ACEI(-17%;95%CI:-28 至-6)降低 HVPG 的效果与 BB(-21%;95%CI:-32 至-9)相似。AA 试验的比较组存在显著的变异,因此无法进行汇总。任何组别的不良事件均无差异,但有选择的研究注意到 ARB/ACEI 治疗代偿失调患者的不良血流动力学效应。

结论

ARB/ACEI 可降低 Child-Pugh A 级肝硬化患者的门静脉压力,且无不良反应。在这组患者中,其疗效和安全性可能归因于对局部肝 RAAS 系统的靶向作用,而代偿失调患者因全身 RAAS 系统的激活而面临低血压和肾功能不全的风险。进一步的研究应确定这些药物作为 BB 的替代或辅助疗法的潜力。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验