Corcodel Nicoleta, Helling Stephan, Rammelsberg Peter, Hassel Alexander J
Department of Prosthodontics, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Eur J Oral Sci. 2010 Jun;118(3):311-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.2010.00730.x.
The objective of this study was to evaluate metameric effects, that is, the dependence of the colours of teeth and shade tabs on the illuminant used. The colours of 49 teeth of 37 participants and of the corresponding shade tabs of the 3D-Master (VITA Zahnfabrik; colour match DeltaE(ab)< 2) were measured using an intra-oral spectrophotometer (VITA Easyshade). Spectral reflectance data (from 400 to 700 nm) were recorded. Commission Internationale de l'Eclairage (CIE) Lab* values were calculated for D65 (reference daylight), A (incandescent light), and TL84 (store/office light) as reference illuminants. A modified metamerism index (Mod-M) and hue-angle ratios were calculated to express differences between tooth and tab colour relative to the difference observed under D65 illumination. The Mod-M for teeth and tabs was greater than unity (indicating a greater colour difference relative to D65) by 57.1% for A and by 49.3% for TL84. Hue-angle ratios of teeth and tabs using the test illuminants were different from those obtained using the standard illuminant D65. If teeth and shade tab matching is conducted using daylight illumination, the colour difference may not be the same under other lighting conditions, leading to perceptible, or even unacceptable, colour differences under these conditions.
本研究的目的是评估同色异谱效应,即牙齿和比色板颜色对照明光源的依赖性。使用口腔内分光光度计(VITA Easyshade)测量了37名参与者的49颗牙齿以及3D-Master(维他齿科;颜色匹配DeltaE(ab)< 2)相应比色板的颜色。记录了光谱反射率数据(400至700纳米)。计算了作为参考照明光源的国际照明委员会(CIE)Lab*值,包括D65(参考日光)、A(白炽灯)和TL84(商店/办公室照明)。计算了修正的同色异谱指数(Mod-M)和色相角比率,以表示相对于在D65照明下观察到的差异,牙齿和比色板颜色之间的差异。牙齿和比色板的Mod-M对于A光源大于1(表明相对于D65有更大的颜色差异)57.1%,对于TL84光源大于49.3%。使用测试照明光源时牙齿和比色板的色相角比率与使用标准照明光源D65时获得的不同。如果在日光照明下进行牙齿和比色板匹配,在其他照明条件下颜色差异可能不一样,导致在这些条件下出现可察觉甚至不可接受的颜色差异。