Department of Prosthodontics, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
J Oral Rehabil. 2010 Nov;37(11):860-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2010.02120.x.
Visual tooth colour assessment by use of the Vita 3D-Master(®) (3D; Vita Zahnfabrik, Bad Säckingen, Germany) is well documented. To improve handling, a new linear arrangement of the shade tabs has been introduced (LG; Linearguide 3D-Master(®) ). The purpose of this study was to investigate whether the linear design has an effect on shade matching. Fifty-six students underwent identical, theoretical and practical training, by use of an Internet learning module [Toothguide Training Software(®) (TT)] and a standardised training programme [Toothguide Training Box(®) (TTB)]. Each student then matched 30 randomly chosen shade tabs presented in an intra-oral setting by a standardised device [Toothguide Check Box(®) (TCB)]; 15 matches were made using the 3D and 15 using the LG shade guide system, under a daylight lamp (840 matches for each guide). It was recorded to what extent the presented and selected shade tabs, or the lightness group of the tabs, matched, also the needed time for colour matching. The results showed that 35% of perfect matches were observed for the 3D and 32% for the LG. The lightness group was correct in 59% of cases for 3D and 56% for LG. Mean time needed for matching of tabs and lightness group was no different between groups (no significant difference for any assessment). Within the limitations of the study design, the colour assessment with regard to performance and time needed in shade matching was not different with the LG or the 3D. Therefore, the user should choose which shade tab arrangement is more applicable.
使用 Vita 3D-Master(®)(3D;Vita Zahnfabrik,巴德沙伊德,德国)进行视觉牙齿颜色评估已有充分记录。为了改善操作,引入了一种新的比色片线性排列方式(LG;Linearguide 3D-Master(®))。本研究的目的是调查线性设计是否会影响比色匹配。56 名学生通过互联网学习模块[Toothguide Training Software(®)(TT)]和标准化培训计划[Toothguide Training Box(®)(TTB)]接受相同的理论和实践培训。然后,每位学生通过标准化设备[Toothguide Check Box(®)(TCB)]在口腔环境中匹配 30 个随机选择的比色片;使用 3D 系统和 LG 比色片系统各匹配 15 个,在日光灯下(每个比色片系统有 840 个匹配)。记录了所呈现和所选比色片或比色片的明度组的匹配程度,以及颜色匹配所需的时间。结果表明,3D 系统观察到 35%的完美匹配,LG 系统观察到 32%的完美匹配。3D 系统中 59%的明度组正确,LG 系统中 56%的明度组正确。两组之间比色片和明度组匹配所需的平均时间没有差异(任何评估均无显着差异)。在研究设计的限制范围内,LG 或 3D 与比色匹配的性能和所需时间的颜色评估没有差异。因此,用户应选择哪种比色片排列方式更适用。