• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与先前知识的不一致会触发儿童的因果解释推理。

Inconsistency with prior knowledge triggers children's causal explanatory reasoning.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University ofTexas at Austin, 1 University Station A8000, Austin, TX 78712-0187, USA.

出版信息

Child Dev. 2010 May-Jun;81(3):929-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01443.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01443.x
PMID:20573114
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3039682/
Abstract

What events trigger causal explanatory reasoning in young children? Children's explanations could be triggered by either consistent events (suggesting that explanations serve a confirmatory function) or inconsistent events (suggesting that they promote discovery of new information). In 2 studies with preschool children (N = 80), events that were consistent with children's prior knowledge were simultaneously contrasted with events that were inconsistent with prior knowledge, and children were invited to explain either outcome (or both). Results demonstrate that inconsistent outcomes are an especially powerful trigger for children's explanations and that the explanations children provide for inconsistent outcomes refer to internal causal properties, overriding perceptual appearances. In sum, the data provide empirical evidence that inconsistent events motivate children to construct explanations, thereby suggesting that children's explanations function in the service of discovery.

摘要

是什么事件引发了幼儿的因果解释推理?儿童的解释可能是由一致的事件(表明解释具有确认功能)或不一致的事件(表明它们促进了新信息的发现)引发的。在两项针对学龄前儿童的研究(N=80)中,同时对比了与儿童先前知识一致的事件和与先前知识不一致的事件,并邀请儿童解释这两种结果(或两者)。结果表明,不一致的结果是儿童解释的特别有力的触发因素,并且儿童对不一致结果的解释涉及内部因果属性,忽略了感知表象。总之,这些数据提供了经验证据,表明不一致的事件促使儿童构建解释,从而表明儿童的解释是为了发现而服务的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4092/3039682/7142ec2fdc3a/nihms266200f7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4092/3039682/be29adc284a6/nihms266200f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4092/3039682/725c31815130/nihms266200f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4092/3039682/4a81723abbc6/nihms266200f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4092/3039682/fed431188365/nihms266200f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4092/3039682/ed16e6433c6f/nihms266200f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4092/3039682/055ad8fd6f55/nihms266200f6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4092/3039682/7142ec2fdc3a/nihms266200f7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4092/3039682/be29adc284a6/nihms266200f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4092/3039682/725c31815130/nihms266200f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4092/3039682/4a81723abbc6/nihms266200f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4092/3039682/fed431188365/nihms266200f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4092/3039682/ed16e6433c6f/nihms266200f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4092/3039682/055ad8fd6f55/nihms266200f6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4092/3039682/7142ec2fdc3a/nihms266200f7.jpg

相似文献

1
Inconsistency with prior knowledge triggers children's causal explanatory reasoning.与先前知识的不一致会触发儿童的因果解释推理。
Child Dev. 2010 May-Jun;81(3):929-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01443.x.
2
Exploring explanation: explaining inconsistent evidence informs exploratory, hypothesis-testing behavior in young children.探索解释:解释不一致的证据会影响幼儿的探索性、假设检验行为。
Child Dev. 2012 Jan-Feb;83(1):173-85. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01691.x. Epub 2011 Dec 16.
3
The emergence of children's causal explanations and theories: evidence from everyday conversation.儿童因果解释与理论的出现:来自日常对话的证据
Dev Psychol. 2001 Sep;37(5):668-83. doi: 10.1037//0012-1649.37.5.668.
4
Learning about causes from people and about people as causes: probabilistic models and social causal reasoning.从人身上学习原因,以及将人视为原因:概率模型和社会因果推理。
Adv Child Dev Behav. 2012;43:125-60. doi: 10.1016/b978-0-12-397919-3.00005-8.
5
Causal learning across domains.跨领域的因果学习。
Dev Psychol. 2004 Mar;40(2):162-76. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.40.2.162.
6
Scientific reasoning in a real-world context: the effect of prior belief and outcome on children's hypothesis-testing strategies.现实世界中的科学推理:先验信念和结果对儿童假设检验策略的影响。
Br J Dev Psychol. 2011 Sep;29(Pt 3):409-24. doi: 10.1348/026151010X496906. Epub 2011 Mar 10.
7
Exploration, Explanation, and Parent-Child Interaction in Museums.博物馆中的探索、解释与亲子互动。
Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 2020 Mar;85(1):7-137. doi: 10.1111/mono.12412.
8
Edge replacement and minimality as models of causal inference in children.边缘替换和最小性作为儿童因果推理的模型。
Adv Child Dev Behav. 2014;46:183-213. doi: 10.1016/b978-0-12-800285-8.00007-8.
9
Causal status effect in children's categorization.
Cognition. 2000 Aug 14;76(2):B35-43. doi: 10.1016/s0010-0277(00)00077-9.
10
Children's questions: a mechanism for cognitive development.儿童的问题:一种认知发展机制。
Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 2007;72(1):vii-ix, 1-112; discussion 113-26. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5834.2007.00412.x.

引用本文的文献

1
When children can explain why they believe a claim, they suggest a better empirical test for that claim.当孩子们能够解释他们为什么相信某一说法时,他们会为该说法提出一个更好的实证检验方法。
R Soc Open Sci. 2024 Dec 11;11(12):241875. doi: 10.1098/rsos.241875. eCollection 2024 Dec.
2
The Development of Cumulative Cultural Learning.累积性文化学习的发展
Annu Rev Dev Psychol. 2019 Dec;1:119-147. doi: 10.1146/annurev-devpsych-121318-084848. Epub 2019 Dec 2.
3
Free viewing biases for complex scenes in preschoolers and adults.幼儿和成人对复杂场景的自由观看偏好。

本文引用的文献

1
Evidence for an explanation advantage in naïve biological reasoning.朴素生物学推理中解释优势的证据。
Cogn Psychol. 2009 Mar;58(2):177-94. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2008.06.002. Epub 2008 Aug 16.
2
Conditional probability versus spatial contiguity in causal learning: Preschoolers use new contingency evidence to overcome prior spatial assumptions.因果学习中的条件概率与空间邻近性:学龄前儿童利用新的偶然性证据克服先前的空间假设。
Dev Psychol. 2007 Jan;43(1):186-96. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.43.1.186.
3
The structure and function of explanations.
Sci Rep. 2023 Jul 21;13(1):11803. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-38854-8.
4
"It kinda has like a mind": Children's and parents' beliefs concerning viral disease transmission for COVID-19 and the common cold.“它有点像有思维一样”:儿童和家长对新冠病毒和普通感冒的病毒疾病传播的信念。
Cognition. 2023 Jun;235:105413. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2023.105413. Epub 2023 Feb 21.
5
Children's and adults' use of fictional discourse and semantic knowledge for prediction in language processing.儿童和成人在语言处理中使用虚构话语和语义知识进行预测。
PLoS One. 2022 Apr 28;17(4):e0267297. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0267297. eCollection 2022.
6
Great apes and human children rationally monitor their decisions.大型猿类和人类儿童会理性地监控自己的决策。
Proc Biol Sci. 2022 Mar 30;289(1971):20212686. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2021.2686. Epub 2022 Mar 23.
7
Children With More Uncertainty in Their Intuitive Theories Seek Domain-Relevant Information.儿童的直觉理论越不确定,他们就越会寻求与领域相关的信息。
Psychol Sci. 2021 Jul;32(7):1147-1156. doi: 10.1177/0956797621994230. Epub 2021 Jun 28.
8
Components and Mechanisms: How Children Talk About Machines in Museum Exhibits.组成部分与机制:儿童如何在博物馆展品中谈论机器
Front Psychol. 2021 May 28;12:636601. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.636601. eCollection 2021.
9
Scientific Reasoning in Biology - the Impact of Domain-General and Domain-Specific Concepts on Children's Observation Competency.生物学中的科学推理——一般领域概念和特定领域概念对儿童观察能力的影响。
Front Psychol. 2020 May 26;11:1050. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01050. eCollection 2020.
10
The elaboration of exploratory play.探索性游戏的开展。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2020 Jul 20;375(1803):20190503. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2019.0503. Epub 2020 Jun 1.
解释的结构与功能。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2006 Oct;10(10):464-70. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2006.08.004. Epub 2006 Aug 30.
4
Explanation and understanding.解释与理解。
Annu Rev Psychol. 2006;57:227-54. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190100.
5
Young children infer causal strength from probabilities and interventions.幼儿从概率和干预中推断因果强度。
Psychol Sci. 2005 Sep;16(9):678-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01595.x.
6
Schematic influences on category learning and recognition memory.对类别学习和识别记忆的示意性影响。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2004 Dec;133(4):534-53. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.133.4.534.
7
Thirteen-month-olds rely on shared labels and shape similarity for inductive inferences.13个月大的婴儿依靠共享标签和形状相似性进行归纳推理。
Child Dev. 2004 Mar-Apr;75(2):409-27. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2004.00683.x.
8
Causal learning across domains.跨领域的因果学习。
Dev Psychol. 2004 Mar;40(2):162-76. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.40.2.162.
9
Knowing the limits of one's understanding: the development of an awareness of an illusion of explanatory depth.了解自身理解的局限:对解释深度错觉的认知发展
J Exp Child Psychol. 2004 Jan;87(1):1-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2003.09.003.
10
A relevance theory of induction.一种归纳的关联理论。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2003 Sep;10(3):517-32. doi: 10.3758/bf03196515.