Suppr超能文献

口服 NEPA(奈妥吡坦-帕洛诺司琼)固定剂量复方制剂用于预防接受多周期化疗患者的急性和延迟性化疗所致恶心和呕吐:来自 2 项随机、双盲 III 期研究的疗效数据。

Fixed combination of oral NEPA (netupitant-palonosetron) for the prevention of acute and delayed chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in patients receiving multiple cycles of chemotherapy: Efficacy data from 2 randomized, double-blind phase III studies.

机构信息

West Cancer Center, Memphis, Tennessee.

Staedt. Klinikum Neuperlach and Harlaching, Munich, Germany.

出版信息

Cancer Med. 2019 May;8(5):2064-2073. doi: 10.1002/cam4.2091. Epub 2019 Apr 9.

Abstract

AIM

To assess the efficacy of oral NEPA (netupitant-palonosetron 300/0.50 mg) over multiple chemotherapy cycles.

METHODS

Two randomized phase III studies evaluated a single dose of oral NEPA given on day 1 in chemotherapy-naive patients receiving anthracycline-cyclophosphamide (AC)-based (Study 1) or highly (HEC)/moderately (MEC) emetogenic chemotherapy (safety Study 2). Oral NEPA was compared with oral palonosetron 0.50 mg (Study 1) or oral aprepitant 125 mg day 1, 80 mg days 2-3/palonosetron 0.50 mg (Study 2; no formal statistical comparisons). Oral dexamethasone was administered in all treatment groups. Complete response (CR; no emesis/no rescue medication), no emesis, and no significant nausea (NSN) rates during acute (0-24 h) and delayed (>24-120 h) phases of chemotherapy cycles 1-4 in each study were evaluated.

RESULTS

In Study 1, 1450 patients received 5969 chemotherapy cycles; in Study 2, 412 patients received 1961 chemotherapy cycles. In each study, ≥75% of patients completed 4 or more cycles. In Study 1, oral NEPA was superior to palonosetron in preventing chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) in the acute and delayed phases of cycle 1, with higher rates of CR (all P < 0.05), no emesis (all P < 0.05), and NSN (delayed phase P < 0.05 cycles 1, 2, and 4) reported across 4 cycles. In Study 2, oral NEPA had numerically higher CR and NSN rates in the acute and delayed phases than aprepitant-palonosetron in MEC/HEC patients.

CONCLUSION

Oral NEPA was highly effective in preventing both acute and delayed CINV over multiple chemotherapy cycles of HEC, AC, and MEC regimens.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS

Study 1, NCT01339260; Study 2, NCT01376297.

摘要

目的

评估口服 NEPA(奈妥吡坦-帕洛诺司琼 300/0.50 毫克)在多个化疗周期中的疗效。

方法

两项随机 III 期研究评估了在接受蒽环类环磷酰胺(AC)为基础(研究 1)或高度(HEC)/中度(MEC)致吐性化疗(安全性研究 2)的化疗初治患者中,给予单次口服 NEPA 剂量的疗效。口服 NEPA 与口服帕洛诺司琼 0.50 毫克(研究 1)或口服阿瑞匹坦 125 毫克第 1 天、80 毫克第 2-3 天/帕洛诺司琼 0.50 毫克(研究 2;无正式的统计学比较)进行比较。所有治疗组均给予口服地塞米松。评估每个研究中第 1-4 个化疗周期的急性(0-24 小时)和迟发性(>24-120 小时)阶段的完全缓解(无呕吐/无解救药物,CR)、无呕吐和无显著恶心(NSN)率。

结果

在研究 1 中,1450 名患者接受了 5969 个化疗周期;在研究 2 中,412 名患者接受了 1961 个化疗周期。在每个研究中,≥75%的患者完成了 4 个或更多周期。在研究 1 中,与帕洛诺司琼相比,口服 NEPA 在预防第 1 个周期的急性和迟发性化疗引起的恶心和呕吐(CINV)方面更具优势,CR 率更高(均 P<0.05),无呕吐(均 P<0.05),以及在第 4 个周期中迟发性恶心(NSN)(第 1、2 和 4 个周期 P<0.05)。在研究 2 中,与阿瑞匹坦-帕洛诺司琼相比,MEC/HEC 患者中,口服 NEPA 在急性和迟发性阶段的 CR 和 NSN 率均具有更高的数值。

结论

口服 NEPA 在 HEC、AC 和 MEC 方案的多个化疗周期中均能有效预防急性和迟发性 CINV。

临床试验注册号

研究 1,NCT01339260;研究 2,NCT01376297。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a4dd/6536946/bf31d2c2b8ec/CAM4-8-2064-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验