Suppr超能文献

德尔塔指掌距(FTP)作为一种新的系统性硬化症手指活动范围的测量方法,其可靠性和有效性。

Reliability and validity of the delta finger-to-palm (FTP), a new measure of finger range of motion in systemic sclerosis.

机构信息

Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, Department of Pediatrics, Division of Rheumatology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.

出版信息

Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2010 Mar-Apr;28(2 Suppl 58):S28-36. Epub 2010 Jun 10.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To determine the reliability and validity of a new measure of finger motion in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc), the 'delta finger-topalm' (delta FTP) and compare its psychometric properties to the traditional measure of finger motion, the finger-topalm (FTP).

METHODS

Phase 1: The reliability of the delta FTP and FTP were examined in 39 patients with SSc. Phase 2: Criterion and convergent construct validity of both measures were examined in 17 patients with SSc by comparing them to other clinical measures: Total Active Range of Motion (TAROM), Hand Mobility in Scleroderma (HAMIS), the Duruoz Hand Index (DHI), Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), and modified Rodnan skin score (mRSS). Phase 3: Sensitivity to change of the delta FTP was investigated in 24 patients with early diffuse cutaneous SSc.

RESULTS

Both measures had excellent intra-rater and inter-rater reliability (ICC 0.92 to 0.99). Fair to strong correlations (rs=0.49-0.94) were observed between the delta FTP and TAROM, HAMIS, and DHI. Fair to moderate correlations were observed between delta FTP and HAQ components related to hand function and upper extremity mRSS. Correlations of the traditional FTP with these measures were fair to strong, but most often the delta FTP outperformed the FTP. The effect size and standardised response mean for the mean delta FTP were 0.50 and 1.10 respectively, over a 2-8 month period.

CONCLUSIONS

The delta FTP is a valid and reliable measure of finger motion in patients with SSc which outperforms the FTP.

摘要

目的

确定一种新的系统性硬化症(SSc)患者手指运动测量方法“指尖到掌部距离差(delta FTP)”的可靠性和有效性,并将其与传统的手指运动测量方法指尖到掌部距离(FTP)的心理测量特性进行比较。

方法

第 1 阶段:39 例 SSc 患者中,检查 delta FTP 和 FTP 的可靠性。第 2 阶段:通过将这两种测量方法与其他临床测量方法(总主动关节活动度(TAROM)、硬皮病手部运动度(HAMIS)、Duruoz 手部指数(DHI)、健康评估问卷(HAQ)和改良 Rodnan 皮肤评分(mRSS))进行比较,检查这两种测量方法的标准和趋同结构有效性。第 3 阶段:在 24 例早期弥漫性皮肤 SSc 患者中,研究 delta FTP 的变化敏感性。

结果

两种方法的内部和外部测试者可靠性都非常好(ICC 0.92 至 0.99)。观察到 delta FTP 与 TAROM、HAMIS 和 DHI 之间存在适度到强的相关性(rs=0.49-0.94)。观察到 delta FTP 与与手部功能和上肢 mRSS 相关的 HAQ 组成部分之间存在适度到中度的相关性。传统 FTP 与这些测量方法之间的相关性为适度到强,但 delta FTP 通常表现优于 FTP。delta FTP 的平均差异的效应大小和标准化反应均值分别为 0.50 和 1.10,在 2-8 个月的时间内。

结论

在 SSc 患者中,delta FTP 是一种有效且可靠的手指运动测量方法,其性能优于 FTP。

相似文献

2
The clinical value of the delta finger to palm distance in systemic sclerosis.
Reumatismo. 2020 Apr 10;72(1):44-51. doi: 10.4081/reumatismo.2020.1233.
4
6
The evaluation of a home-based program for hands in patients with systemic sclerosis.
J Hand Ther. 2019 Jul-Sep;32(3):313-321. doi: 10.1016/j.jht.2017.10.013. Epub 2017 Dec 1.
7
Validity and psychometric characteristics of the Duruöz Hand Index (DHI) with systemic sclerosis.
Rheumatol Int. 2025 Mar 15;45(4):75. doi: 10.1007/s00296-025-05829-z.
8
The correlation between durometer score and modified Rodnan skin score in systemic sclerosis.
Rheumatol Int. 2012 Aug;32(8):2465-70. doi: 10.1007/s00296-011-1993-9. Epub 2011 Jul 19.
9
Validity, reliability, responsiveness and feasibility of four hand mobility measures in hand osteoarthritis.
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2018 Mar 1;57(3):525-532. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kex438.
10

引用本文的文献

2
Can we avoid casting for suspected scaphoid fractures? A multicenter randomized controlled trial.
J Orthop Traumatol. 2025 Mar 5;26(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s10195-025-00822-5.
4
Screening tool development for hand surgery referrals in systemic sclerosis.
Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2023 Aug 17;78:100270. doi: 10.1016/j.clinsp.2023.100270. eCollection 2023.
6
Serum-soluble ST2 and systemic sclerosis arthropathy.
Clin Rheumatol. 2023 Mar;42(3):871-877. doi: 10.1007/s10067-022-06367-w. Epub 2022 Sep 13.
7
Assessment of disease outcome measures in systemic sclerosis.
Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2022 Sep;18(9):527-541. doi: 10.1038/s41584-022-00803-6. Epub 2022 Jul 20.
10

本文引用的文献

2
A power primer.
Psychol Bull. 1992 Jul;112(1):155-9. doi: 10.1037//0033-2909.112.1.155.
3
Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability.
Psychol Bull. 1979 Mar;86(2):420-8. doi: 10.1037//0033-2909.86.2.420.
7
Clinical significance of patient-reported questionnaire data: another step toward consensus.
J Clin Epidemiol. 2005 Dec;58(12):1217-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.07.009. Epub 2005 Oct 13.
8
9
Validity of HAMIS: a test of hand mobility in scleroderma.
Arthritis Care Res. 2000 Dec;13(6):382-7.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验