Suppr超能文献

公共卫生的未来在哪里?

Where is the future in public health?

机构信息

University of York, York, UK.

出版信息

Milbank Q. 2010 Jun;88(2):149-68. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2010.00594.x.

Abstract

CONTEXT

Today's societies have far-reaching impacts on future conditions for health. Against this backdrop, this article explores how the future is represented in contemporary public health, examining both its conceptual base and influential approaches through which evidence is generated for policy.

METHODS

Mission statements and official reviews provide insight into how the future is represented in public health's conceptual and ethical foundations. For its research practices, the article takes examples from epidemiological, intervention, and economic research, selecting risk-factor epidemiology, randomized controlled trials, and economic evaluation as exemplars.

FINDINGS

Concepts and ethics suggest that public health research and policy will be concerned with protecting both today's and tomorrow's populations from conditions that threaten their health. But rather than facilitating sustained engagement with future conditions and future health, exemplary approaches to gathering evidence focus on today's population. Thus, risk-factor epidemiology pinpoints risks in temporal proximity to the individual; controlled trials track short-term effects of interventions on the participants' health; and economic evaluations weigh policies according to their value to the current population. While their orientation to the present and near future aligns well with the compressed timescales for policy delivery on which democratic governments tend to work, it makes it difficult for the public health community to direct attention to conditions for future health.

CONCLUSIONS

This article points to the need for research perspectives and practices that, consistent with public health's conceptual and ethical foundations, represent the interests of both tomorrow's and today's populations.

摘要

背景

当今社会对未来的健康状况有着深远的影响。在此背景下,本文探讨了当代公共卫生领域中未来是如何被呈现的,审视了其概念基础和有影响力的方法,这些方法为政策制定提供了证据。

方法

使命陈述和官方审查提供了洞察公共卫生在概念和伦理基础中如何呈现未来的视角。对于其研究实践,本文从流行病学、干预和经济研究中选取了例子,选择风险因素流行病学、随机对照试验和经济评估作为范例。

发现

概念和伦理表明,公共卫生研究和政策将关注保护今天和明天的人群免受威胁其健康的条件的影响。但是,这些收集证据的典范方法并没有促进对未来条件和未来健康的持续关注,而是关注当前的人口。因此,风险因素流行病学将风险指向与个体时间接近的风险;对照试验跟踪干预对参与者健康的短期影响;经济评估根据政策对当前人口的价值来衡量政策。虽然它们与政策制定的压缩时间尺度相一致,符合民主政府的工作方式,但这使得公共卫生界难以将注意力集中在未来健康的条件上。

结论

本文指出,需要研究视角和实践,这些视角和实践符合公共卫生的概念和伦理基础,代表了明天和今天的人口的利益。

相似文献

1
Where is the future in public health?
Milbank Q. 2010 Jun;88(2):149-68. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2010.00594.x.
2
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
3
The public health enterprise: examining our twenty-first-century policy challenges.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2006 Jul-Aug;25(4):900-10. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.25.4.900.
4
Public health's promise for the future: 1989 presidential address.
Am J Public Health. 1990 Aug;80(8):909-12. doi: 10.2105/ajph.80.8.909.
5
Australia in 2030: what is our path to health for all?
Med J Aust. 2021 May;214 Suppl 8:S5-S40. doi: 10.5694/mja2.51020.
6
New directions in European public health research: report of a workshop.
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2007 Mar;61(3):194-7. doi: 10.1136/jech.2006.048504.
7
[Health promotion: the evolution of a paradigm and contemporary challenges].
Rev Salud Publica (Bogota). 2014 Mar-Apr;16(2):307-17.
8
Public health, populations, and lethal ingestion.
Disabil Health J. 2010 Jan;3(1):56-70. doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2009.09.005.
10
Epidemiology Congresses XIX, XX and beyond: back to the future of population health.
Public Health. 2012 Mar;126(3):271-273. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2011.12.011. Epub 2012 Feb 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Artificial Intelligence (AI) and the future of Iran's Primary Health Care (PHC) system.
BMC Prim Care. 2025 Mar 21;26(1):75. doi: 10.1186/s12875-025-02773-6.
2
Adaptation of food guideline messages for the visually impaired in Lima, Peru: a validation experience.
Rev Peru Med Exp Salud Publica. 2023 Out-Dec;40(4):485-489. doi: 10.17843/rpmesp.2023.404.12973.
5
Old myths, new myths: challenging myths in public health.
Am J Public Health. 2015 Apr;105(4):665-9. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2014.302433. Epub 2015 Feb 25.
6
The implications of fundamental cause theory for priority setting.
Am J Public Health. 2014 Oct;104(10):1839-43. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2014.302058. Epub 2014 Aug 14.

本文引用的文献

2
Health and climate change: a roadmap for applied research.
Lancet. 2009 May 16;373(9676):1663-5. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60926-0.
5
Global health equity and climate stabilisation: a common agenda.
Lancet. 2008 Nov 8;372(9650):1677-83. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61692-X.
7
The determinants of policy for population health.
Health Econ Policy Law. 2006 Oct;1(Pt 4):395-407. doi: 10.1017/S1744133106006037.
8
Population tobacco control interventions and their effects on social inequalities in smoking: systematic review.
Tob Control. 2008 Aug;17(4):230-7. doi: 10.1136/tc.2007.023911. Epub 2008 Apr 21.
9
THE UNTILLED FIELDS OF PUBLIC HEALTH.
Science. 1920 Jan 9;51(1306):23-33. doi: 10.1126/science.51.1306.23.
10
Global and regional drivers of accelerating CO2 emissions.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Jun 12;104(24):10288-93. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0700609104. Epub 2007 May 22.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验