Jaff Michael R, Cahill Kevin E, Yu Andrew P, Birnbaum Howard G, Engelhart Luella M
Massachusetts General Hospital Vascular Center, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
Ann Vasc Surg. 2010 Jul;24(5):577-87. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2010.03.015.
Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is a common disorder with multiple options for treatment, ranging from medical interventions, surgical revascularization, and endovascular therapy. Despite the explosive advances in endovascular therapy, cost-effective methods of care have not been well defined. We analyze therapeutic strategies, outcomes, and medical cost of treatment among Medicare patients with PAD.
Patients who underwent therapy for PAD were identified from a 5% random sample of Medicare beneficiaries from Medicare Standard Analytic Files for the period 1999-2005. Clinical outcomes (death, amputation, new clinical symptoms related to PAD) and direct medical costs were examined by chosen revascularization options (endovascular, surgical, and combinations). One-year PAD prevalence increased steadily from 8.2% in 1999 to 9.5% in 2005. The risk-adjusted time to first post-treatment clinical outcome was lowest in those treated with "percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) or atherectomy and stents" (HR, 0.829; 95% CI, 0.793-0.865; p < 0.001) and stents only (HR, 0.904; 95% CI, 0.848-0.963; p = 0.002) compared with PTA alone. The lowest per patient risk-adjusted costs during the quarter of the first observed treatment were associated with "PTA and stents" ($15,197), and stents only ($15,867). Risk-adjusted costs for surgical procedures (bypass and endarterectomy) were $27,021 during the same period. Diabetes was present in 61.7% of the PAD population and was associated with higher risks of clinical events and higher medical costs compared with PAD patients without diabetes.
The clinical and economic burden of PAD in the Medicare population is substantial, and the interventions used to treat PAD are associated with differences in clinical and economic outcomes. Prospective cost-effectiveness analyses should be included in future PAD therapy trials to inform payers and providers of the relative value of available treatment options.
外周动脉疾病(PAD)是一种常见疾病,有多种治疗选择,包括药物干预、外科血管重建和血管内治疗。尽管血管内治疗取得了巨大进展,但具有成本效益的治疗方法尚未明确界定。我们分析了医疗保险中患有PAD的患者的治疗策略、结果和医疗费用。
从1999 - 2005年医疗保险标准分析文件中5%的医疗保险受益人的随机样本中识别出接受PAD治疗的患者。通过选定的血管重建选择(血管内、外科及联合治疗)来检查临床结果(死亡、截肢、与PAD相关的新临床症状)和直接医疗费用。1年的PAD患病率从1999年的8.2%稳步上升至2005年的9.5%。与单纯经皮腔内血管成形术(PTA)相比,接受“经皮腔内血管成形术(PTA)或旋切术及支架置入术”治疗的患者(风险比[HR],0.829;95%置信区间[CI],0.793 - 0.865;p < 0.001)和仅接受支架置入术治疗的患者(HR,0.904;95% CI,0.848 - 0.963;p = 0.002)首次治疗后至临床结果的风险调整时间最短。在首次观察到的治疗季度中,每位患者风险调整后的最低费用与“PTA及支架置入术”(15,197美元)和仅支架置入术(15,867美元)相关。同期外科手术(搭桥和动脉内膜切除术)的风险调整费用为27,021美元。61.7%的PAD患者患有糖尿病,与无糖尿病的PAD患者相比,糖尿病患者临床事件风险更高,医疗费用更高。
医疗保险人群中PAD的临床和经济负担巨大,用于治疗PAD的干预措施与临床和经济结果的差异相关。未来的PAD治疗试验应纳入前瞻性成本效益分析,以便为付款人和医疗服务提供者提供现有治疗选择的相对价值信息。