Hartmann A, Schlottog B, Kober G, Reschke B, Jungmann E, Althoff P H, Kaltenbach M
Abt. für Kardiologie, Klinikum der J.-W.-Goethe-Universität, Frankfurt/Main.
Z Kardiol. 1991 Mar;80(3):201-6.
31 patients with coronary artery disease (11 patients with diabetes mellitus and autonomic neuropathy. 10 patients with diabetes without neuropathy, and 10 patients with asymptomatic myocardial ischemia) participated in a study designed to investigate whether there is a difference in forearm skeletal muscle ischemia and pain threshold. The degree of ischemia was determined by plethysmographically measured reactive hyperemia. There was no difference in maximum reactive hyperemia after passive forearm ischemia of 5-min duration in the three groups. After symptom-limited ischemic work, there was significantly more reactive hyperemia in patients with silent myocardial ischemia as compared to diabetic patients. Exercise time was longer in patients with silent myocardial ischemia (153 +/- 51 s) than in patients with diabetic neuropathy (139 +/- 45 s) and diabetics without neuropathy (120 +/- 45 s). Pain as a cause of termination of symptom-limited ischemic forearm exercise occurred less frequently in patients with diabetic neuropathy (2/11) and patients with silent myocardial ischemia (3/10) as compared to patients with diabetes without neuropathy. Patients with silent myocardial ischemia had a higher ischemic tolerance in the ischemic working forearm than did diabetic patients with and without neuropathy. In patients with neuropathy, however, ischemic pain occurred less frequently at the same ischemic work level compared to diabetics without neuropathy. Therefore, diabetic neuropathy appears to facilitate the occurrence of silent myocardial ischemia. The data presented here suggest that there is a qualitative difference in ischemic tolerance between patients with silent myocardial ischemia and patients with diabetic neuropathy.
31例冠心病患者(11例患有糖尿病并伴有自主神经病变,10例患有糖尿病但无神经病变,10例患有无症状心肌缺血)参与了一项旨在研究前臂骨骼肌缺血和疼痛阈值是否存在差异的研究。缺血程度通过体积描记法测量反应性充血来确定。三组在5分钟被动前臂缺血后的最大反应性充血方面没有差异。在症状受限的缺血性运动后,与糖尿病患者相比,无症状心肌缺血患者的反应性充血明显更多。无症状心肌缺血患者的运动时间(153±51秒)比糖尿病神经病变患者(139±45秒)和无神经病变的糖尿病患者(120±45秒)更长。与无神经病变的糖尿病患者相比,糖尿病神经病变患者(2/11)和无症状心肌缺血患者(3/10)因疼痛导致症状受限的缺血性前臂运动终止的情况较少。无症状心肌缺血患者在前臂缺血运动中的缺血耐受性高于有和无神经病变的糖尿病患者。然而,与无神经病变的糖尿病患者相比,在相同缺血运动水平下,神经病变患者的缺血性疼痛发生频率较低。因此,糖尿病神经病变似乎促进了无症状心肌缺血的发生。此处呈现的数据表明,无症状心肌缺血患者和糖尿病神经病变患者在缺血耐受性方面存在质的差异。