van Doormaal Tristan P C, van der Zwan Albert, van der Tweel Ingeborg, Verdaasdonk Rudolf, Verweij Bon H, Regli Luca, Tulleken Cornelius A F
Department of Neurosurgery, Rudolph Magnus Institute of Neuroscience, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Lasers Surg Med. 2010 Jul;42(5):418-24. doi: 10.1002/lsm.20926.
A key element in the Excimer Laser Assisted Non-occlusive Anastomosis (ELANA) technique is the retrieval of a disc ("flap") of artery wall from the anastomosis by the laser catheter tip. We assessed if the flap retrieval rate could be optimized.
We used a specially designed in vitro model using rabbit aortas. We tested three essential elements of the technique: (1) laser energy (10, 13, 15, or 18 mJ), (2) pressure on the catheter (0, 0.1, 0.2, or 0.4 N), and (3) number of lasing episodes (1 or 2). We made 2,280 anastomoses using different combinations of settings. With a logistic regression model we assessed the influence of each parameter. Current clinical settings (10 mJ, 0.2 N, 1 episode) were reference categories.
Flap retrieval rate using conventional settings was 86.7%, equivalent to earlier reported clinical data. A significantly higher flap retrieval appeared when laser energy was increased to 13 mJ (OR 3.0, 95% CI 1.8-4.8), 15 mJ (OR 3.2, 95% CI 1.9-5.3), and 18 mJ (OR 3.7, 95% CI 2.2-6.2). A second lasing episode also significantly increased flap retrieval (OR 2.1, 95% CI 1.4-3.0). However, if we increased energy to 15 or 18 mJ, the effect of a second laser episode was insignificant. When the catheter was pushed down with 0.4 N, flap retrieval decreased significantly in all subgroups (OR 0.07, 95% CI 0.04-0.14).
The flap retrieval of the ELANA anastomosis technique can be optimized to 100% by setting the laser energy at 15 mJ. However, safety studies are necessary before clinical application. A second lasing episode of 10 mJ is a good alternative to increase the flap retrieval. Moreover, the surgeon should be trained to apply not more than 0.2 N on the catheter.
准分子激光辅助非闭塞性吻合术(ELANA)技术的一个关键要素是通过激光导管尖端从吻合部位获取动脉壁的圆盘状组织(“瓣片”)。我们评估了是否可以优化瓣片获取率。
我们使用了一个专门设计的体外模型,采用兔主动脉。我们测试了该技术的三个关键要素:(1)激光能量(10、13、15或18 mJ),(2)施加在导管上的压力(0、0.1、0.2或0.4 N),以及(3)激光照射次数(1次或2次)。我们使用不同的设置组合进行了2280次吻合。通过逻辑回归模型,我们评估了每个参数的影响。当前的临床设置(10 mJ、0.2 N、1次照射)作为参考类别。
使用传统设置时瓣片获取率为86.7%,与早期报告的临床数据相当。当激光能量增加到13 mJ(比值比3.0,95%可信区间1.8 - 4.8)、15 mJ(比值比3.2,95%可信区间1.9 - 5.3)和18 mJ(比值比3.7,95%可信区间2.2 - 6.2)时,瓣片获取率显著更高。第二次激光照射也显著提高了瓣片获取率(比值比2.1,95%可信区间1.4 - 3.0)。然而,如果我们将能量增加到15或18 mJ,第二次激光照射的效果就不显著了。当以0.4 N的力向下推导管时,所有亚组的瓣片获取率均显著下降(比值比0.07,95%可信区间0.04 - 0.14)。
通过将激光能量设置为15 mJ,可以将ELANA吻合术技术的瓣片获取率优化至100%。然而,在临床应用前需要进行安全性研究。10 mJ的第二次激光照射是提高瓣片获取率的一个良好替代方法。此外,外科医生应接受培训,在导管上施加的力不超过0.2 N。