College of Mathematics and Information Science, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi'an, People's Republic of China.
PLoS One. 2010 Jun 18;5(6):e10911. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0010911.
Since the emergence of influenza A/H1N1 pandemic virus in March-April 2009, very stringent interventions including Fengxiao were implemented to prevent importation of infected cases and decelerate the disease spread in mainland China. The extent to which these measures have been effective remains elusive. We sought to investigate the effectiveness of Fengxiao that may inform policy decisions on improving community-based interventions for management of on-going outbreaks in China, in particular during the Spring Festival in mid-February 2010 when nationwide traveling will be substantially increased. We obtained data on initial laboratory-confirmed cases of H1N1 in the province of Shaanxi and used Markov-chain Monte-Carlo (MCMC) simulations to estimate the reproduction number. Given the estimates for the exposed and infectious periods of the novel H1N1 virus, we estimated a mean reproduction number of 1.68 (95% CI 1.45-1.92) and other A/H1N1 epidemiological parameters. Our results based on a spatially stratified population dynamical model show that the early implementation of Fengxiao can delay the epidemic peak significantly and prevent the disease spread to the general population but may also, if not implemented appropriately, cause more severe outbreak within universities/colleges, while late implementation of Fengxiao can achieve nothing more than no implementation. Strengthening local control strategies (quarantine and hygiene precaution) is much more effective in mitigating outbreaks and inhibiting the successive waves than implementing Fengxiao. Either strong mobility or high transport-related transmission rate during the Spring Festival holiday will not reverse the ongoing outbreak, but both will result in a large new wave. The findings suggest that Fengxiao and travel precautions should not be relaxed unless strict measures of quarantine, isolation, and hygiene precaution practices are put in place. Integration and prompt implementation of these interventions can significantly reduce the overall attack rate of pandemic outbreaks.
自 2009 年 3 月至 4 月甲型 H1N1 流感大流行病毒出现以来,中国内地采取了非常严格的防控措施,包括封校,以防止输入病例和减缓疾病传播。这些措施的效果程度仍不清楚。我们旨在调查封校措施的有效性,为中国正在进行的疫情防控策略提供信息,特别是在 2010 年 2 月春节期间,全国范围内的出行量将大幅增加。我们获得了陕西省首例实验室确诊的甲型 H1N1 病例数据,并使用马尔可夫链蒙特卡罗(MCMC)模拟来估计繁殖数。鉴于新型 H1N1 病毒的暴露和感染期的估计值,我们估计平均繁殖数为 1.68(95%CI 1.45-1.92)和其他 A/H1N1 流行病学参数。我们基于空间分层人口动力学模型的结果表明,早期实施封校可以显著推迟疫情高峰期并防止疾病传播到一般人群,但如果实施不当,也可能导致大学/学院内更严重的爆发,而晚实施封校则无法取得任何效果。加强地方控制策略(检疫和卫生预防措施)对于减轻疫情和抑制连续波比实施封校更为有效。春节假期期间的强流动性或高交通相关传播率不会逆转正在进行的疫情爆发,但两者都会导致新的大波。研究结果表明,除非采取严格的检疫、隔离和卫生预防措施,否则不应放松封校和旅行预防措施。这些干预措施的整合和及时实施可以显著降低大流行疫情的总体发病率。