School of Applied Sciences, Northumbria University, Ellison Building, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 8ST, UK.
Environ Geochem Health. 2011 Apr;33(2):167-81. doi: 10.1007/s10653-010-9330-x. Epub 2010 Jun 29.
The metal content was determined in soils from a former, historic, contaminated land site and now a 'green' public open space in N.E. England. Using a systematic sampling grid approach, 32 soil samples were taken from locations across the site and analyzed for six potentially toxic elements (Cd, Cr, Cu, Ni, Pb, and Zn). Initially, the pseudo-total metal content of the soils was determined using acid digestion followed by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry analysis. This data was evaluated against published soil guideline value (SGV) and generic assessment criteria (GAC) values; it was found that 21% (i.e., 41 samples) exceeded the stated lower values. The data was then compared to the oral bioaccessibility of the soils, which was assessed by an in-vitro gastrointestinal extraction procedure. The results, determined as the % BAF, indicated that overall bioaccessibility was low (<10% BAF) for all the elements studied; the exception was Cd. Given that SGV/GAC values are based on generic land-use categories and not a public open space, as investigated in this work, further work is recommended on developing a qualitative risk assessment at the site to estimate the risks posed to human health via the direct and indirect soil ingestion pathway.
本研究旨在测定英格兰东北部一处历史遗留污染场地现“绿色”公共开放空间土壤中的金属含量。采用系统采样网格方法,从场地各处采集了 32 个土壤样本,并分析了六种潜在有毒元素(Cd、Cr、Cu、Ni、Pb 和 Zn)。首先,使用酸消解和电感耦合等离子体质谱分析方法测定土壤的全金属含量。将该数据与已发表的土壤指导值(SGV)和通用评估标准(GAC)值进行比较,发现 21%(即 41 个样本)超过了规定的低值。然后,将数据与土壤的口服生物可给性进行比较,采用体外胃肠道提取程序进行评估。结果以 BAF%表示,表明所有研究元素的总体生物可给性较低(<10%BAF);Cd 是个例外。鉴于 SGV/GAC 值是基于通用土地利用类别制定的,而不是像本研究中调查的那样是公共开放空间,因此建议在该场地开展定性风险评估工作,以通过直接和间接土壤摄入途径估计对人类健康构成的风险。