Mathematics and Biosciences Group, Max F. Perutz Laboratories and Faculty of Mathematics, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Bioessays. 2010 Jul;32(7):564-70. doi: 10.1002/bies.201000023.
The neutral theory of biodiversity purports that patterns in the distribution and abundance of species do not depend on adaptive differences between species (i.e. niche differentiation) but solely on random fluctuations in population size ("ecological drift"), along with dispersal and speciation. In this framework, the ultimate driver of biodiversity is speciation. However, the original neutral theory made strongly simplifying assumptions about the mechanisms of speciation, which has led to some clearly unrealistic predictions. In response, several recent studies have combined neutral community models with more elaborate speciation models. These efforts have alleviated some of the problems of the earlier approaches, while confirming the general ability of neutral theory to predict empirical patterns of biodiversity. However, the models also show that the mode of speciation can have a strong impact on relative species abundances. Future work should compare these results to diversity patterns arising from non-neutral modes of speciation, such as adaptive radiations.
生物多样性的中性理论认为,物种的分布和丰度模式不依赖于物种之间的适应性差异(即生态位分化),而仅取决于种群大小的随机波动(“生态漂移”),以及扩散和物种形成。在这个框架中,生物多样性的最终驱动因素是物种形成。然而,最初的中性理论对物种形成的机制做出了强烈的简化假设,这导致了一些明显不现实的预测。作为回应,最近的一些研究将中性群落模型与更精细的物种形成模型相结合。这些努力缓解了早期方法的一些问题,同时证实了中性理论预测生物多样性经验模式的一般能力。然而,这些模型也表明,物种形成的模式会对相对物种丰度产生强烈影响。未来的工作应该将这些结果与来自非中性物种形成模式(如适应性辐射)的多样性模式进行比较。