Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, 600 Jefferson Avenue, Memphis, TN 38105, USA.
J Interpers Violence. 2011 Mar;26(5):1012-35. doi: 10.1177/0886260510365872. Epub 2010 Jun 28.
Health care professionals have acknowledged intimate partner violence (IPV) as a highly prevalent public health problem necessitating the creation of standardized education programs, survey tools, and well-defined outcome measures. Testing and evaluation of these measures, however, has been limited to specific populations of health care professionals. In 2007 and 2008, psychometric properties of the Physician Readiness to Manage Intimate Partner Violence Survey (PREMIS) were adapted, tested, and evaluated on a group of medicine, nursing, social work, and dentistry students during their last semester of college. The adapted instrument demonstrated high reliability within some IPV constructs, and six of the eight scales described in the original PREMIS were identified. Three scales presented a Cronbach's α ≥ .70, demonstrating acceptable reliability, and a new scale, IPV Screening, was also identified that showed good reliability (α = .74). The adapted instrument showed good stability of psychometric properties in the student population and generally good correlation within several measures.
医疗保健专业人员已经认识到亲密伴侣暴力（IPV）是一个高度普遍的公共卫生问题，需要创建标准化的教育计划、调查工具和明确的结果衡量标准。然而，这些措施的测试和评估仅限于特定的医疗保健专业人员群体。2007 年和 2008 年，对医学生、护士、社会工作者和牙医学生在大学最后一个学期进行了 Physician Readiness to Manage Intimate Partner Violence Survey（PREMIS）的改编、测试和评估。改编后的工具在一些 IPV 结构内显示出较高的可靠性，并且在原始 PREMIS 中描述的八个量表中的六个得到了确认。三个量表的 Cronbach's α≥.70，显示出可接受的可靠性，并且还确定了一个新的量表，即 IPV 筛查，也显示出良好的可靠性（α=.74）。改编后的工具在学生群体中表现出良好的心理计量学特性稳定性，并且在几个测量中具有良好的相关性。
