Taccini Federica, Mannarini Stefania
Interdepartmental Center for Family Research, University of Padova, 35131 Padova, Italy.
Department of Developmental Psychology and Socialization, University of Padova, 35131 Padova, Italy.
Behav Sci (Basel). 2023 Feb 21;13(3):194. doi: 10.3390/bs13030194.
The objectives of the present manuscript were to review the literature on stigma toward survivors of intimate partner violence (IPV) and to identify the most widely used assessment techniques to investigate this issue. The PRISMA guidelines were followed, and the systematic review was registered in PROSPERO, registration number: CRD42022327410. PsycINFO, Scopus, Web of Science, and PubMed were searched. Two authors selected and extracted data from eligible studies. In total, 4220 hits were returned from the database search, and of them, 24 articles met the inclusion criteria. The articles included in the review confirm the presence of stigma toward IPV survivors, which can be divided into public stigma and self-stigma. Specifically, 17 studies were related only to public stigma, 1 study focused only on self-stigma, and 6 articles investigated aspects related to both public and self-stigma. Both qualitative and quantitative studies have been conducted on this topic. The considerations on the methodologies and assessment measures used in the included studies will be discussed in the results section. Based on the research included, it was possible to develop a contribution to the definition of stigma, which will be discussed in the article.
本手稿的目的是回顾关于亲密伴侣暴力（IPV）幸存者污名化的文献，并确定用于调查该问题的最广泛使用的评估技术。遵循了PRISMA指南，该系统评价已在PROSPERO注册，注册号：CRD42022327410。检索了PsycINFO、Scopus、科学网和PubMed。两位作者从符合条件的研究中选择并提取数据。数据库搜索共返回4220条记录，其中24篇文章符合纳入标准。综述中纳入的文章证实了对IPV幸存者污名化的存在，可分为公众污名和自我污名。具体而言，17项研究仅涉及公众污名，1项研究仅关注自我污名，6篇文章调查了与公众污名和自我污名相关的方面。关于这个主题已经进行了定性和定量研究。纳入研究中使用的方法和评估措施将在结果部分进行讨论。基于所纳入的研究，有可能对污名的定义做出贡献，这将在本文中进行讨论。
