• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

有抑郁症亲身经历的人(PWLE):描述并反思加拿大艾伯塔省抑郁症研究优先事项设定中明确的患者参与过程。

People with lived experience (PWLE) of depression: describing and reflecting on an explicit patient engagement process within depression research priority setting in Alberta, Canada.

作者信息

Breault Lorraine J, Rittenbach Katherine, Hartle Kelly, Babins-Wagner Robbie, de Beaudrap Catherine, Jasaui Yamile, Ardell Emily, Purdon Scot E, Michael Ashton, Sullivan Ginger, Unger Aakai'naimsskai'piiaakii Sharon Ryder, Vandall-Walker Lorin, Necyk Brad, Krawec Kiara, Manafò Elizabeth, Mason-Lai Ping

机构信息

1Department of Psychiatry Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.

DRPS Steering Committee, Edmonton, Canada.

出版信息

Res Involv Engagem. 2018 Oct 16;4:37. doi: 10.1186/s40900-018-0115-1. eCollection 2018.

DOI:10.1186/s40900-018-0115-1
PMID:30349739
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6190547/
Abstract

PLAIN ENGLISH SUMMARY

The Alberta Depression Research Priority Setting Project aimed to meaningfully involve patients, families and clinicians in determining a research agenda aligned to the needs of Albertans who have experienced depression. The project was modeled after a process developed in the UK by the James Lind Alliance and adapted to fit the Alberta, Canada context. This study describes the processes used to ensure the voices of people with lived experience of depression were integrated throughout the project stages. The year long project culminated with a facilitated session to identify the top essential areas of depression research focus. People with lived experience were engaged as part of the project's Steering Committee, as survey participants and as workshop participants. It is hoped this process will guide future priority setting opportunities and advance depression research in Alberta.

ABSTRACT

The Depression Research Priority Setting (DRPS) project has the clear aim of describing the patient engagement process used to identify depression research priorities and to reflect on the successes of this engagement approach, positive impacts and opportunities for improvement. To help support patient-oriented depression research priority setting in Alberta, the Patient Engagement (PE) Platform of the Alberta Strategy for Patient Oriented Research Support for People and Patient-Oriented Research and Trials (SUPPORT) Unit designed, along with the support of their partners in addictions and mental health, an explit process to engage patients in the design and execution of the DRPS. The UK's James Lind Alliance (JLA) Priority Setting Partnership (PSP) method was adapted into a six step process to ensure voices of "people with lived experience" (PWLE) with depression were included throughout the project stages. This study uses an explicit and parallel patient engagement process throughout each estage of the PSP designed by the PE Platform. Patient engagement was divided into a five step process: i) Awareness and relationship building; ii) Co-designing and co-developing a shared decision making process; iii) Collaborative communication; iv) Collective sensemaking; and v) Acknowledgement, celebration and recognition. A formative evaluation of the six PE processes was undertaken to explore the success of the parallel patient engagement process. This project was successful in engaging people with lived depression experience as partners in research priority setting, incorporating their voices into the discussions and decisions that led to the top 25 depression research questions. The DRPS project has positively contributed to depression research in Canada by identifying the priorities of Albertans who have experienced depression for depression research. Dissemination activities to promote further knowledge exchange of prioritized research questions, with emphasis on the importance of process in engaging the voices of PWLE of depression are planned.

摘要

通俗易懂的总结

艾伯塔省抑郁症研究优先事项设定项目旨在让患者、家属和临床医生切实参与确定与经历过抑郁症的艾伯塔省居民需求相契合的研究议程。该项目仿照英国詹姆斯·林德联盟开发的一个流程,并进行了调整以适应加拿大艾伯塔省的情况。本研究描述了在项目各阶段用于确保将有抑郁症亲身经历者的声音纳入其中的流程。这个为期一年的项目以一场促进会议告终,以确定抑郁症研究重点的首要关键领域。有亲身经历者作为项目指导委员会成员、调查参与者和研讨会参与者参与其中。希望这个流程将为未来的优先事项设定机会提供指导,并推动艾伯塔省的抑郁症研究。

摘要

抑郁症研究优先事项设定(DRPS)项目的明确目标是描述用于确定抑郁症研究优先事项的患者参与流程,并反思这种参与方式的成功之处、积极影响和改进机会。为了帮助支持艾伯塔省以患者为导向的抑郁症研究优先事项设定,艾伯塔省以患者为导向的研究支持战略的患者参与(PE)平台以及成瘾与心理健康领域的合作伙伴共同设计了一个明确的流程,让患者参与DRPS的设计和实施。英国詹姆斯·林德联盟(JLA)优先事项设定伙伴关系(PSP)方法被改编为一个六步流程,以确保在项目各阶段纳入有抑郁症“亲身经历者”(PWLE)的声音。本研究在PE平台设计的PSP的每个阶段都采用了明确且并行的患者参与流程。患者参与分为五个步骤:i)提高认识和建立关系;ii)共同设计和共同开发共享决策过程;iii)协作沟通;iv)集体意义建构;v)认可、庆祝和表彰。对这六个PE流程进行了形成性评估,以探索并行患者参与流程的成功之处。该项目成功地让有抑郁症亲身经历者作为研究优先事项设定的合作伙伴参与进来,将他们的声音纳入导致前25个抑郁症研究问题的讨论和决策中。DRPS项目通过确定经历过抑郁症的艾伯塔省居民对抑郁症研究的优先事项,为加拿大的抑郁症研究做出了积极贡献。计划开展传播活动,以促进对优先研究问题的进一步知识交流,重点强调在纳入抑郁症PWLE声音方面流程的重要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8bae/6190547/a75311b0ed88/40900_2018_115_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8bae/6190547/a75311b0ed88/40900_2018_115_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8bae/6190547/a75311b0ed88/40900_2018_115_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
People with lived experience (PWLE) of depression: describing and reflecting on an explicit patient engagement process within depression research priority setting in Alberta, Canada.有抑郁症亲身经历的人(PWLE):描述并反思加拿大艾伯塔省抑郁症研究优先事项设定中明确的患者参与过程。
Res Involv Engagem. 2018 Oct 16;4:37. doi: 10.1186/s40900-018-0115-1. eCollection 2018.
2
The top research questions asked by people with lived depression experience in Alberta: a survey.艾伯塔省有抑郁症生活经历者提出的首要研究问题:一项调查。
CMAJ Open. 2018 Sep 28;6(3):E398-E405. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20180034. Print 2018 Jul-Sep.
3
Partnering For Pain: a Priority Setting Partnership to identify patient-oriented research priorities for pediatric chronic pain in Canada.为疼痛而合作:一项确定加拿大儿科慢性疼痛以患者为导向的研究重点的优先事项设定合作项目。
CMAJ Open. 2019 Nov 7;7(4):E654-E664. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20190060. Print 2019 Oct-Dec.
4
Exploring the challenge of health research priority setting in partnership: reflections on the methodology used by the James Lind Alliance Pressure Ulcer Priority Setting Partnership.探索合作中确定卫生研究重点的挑战:对詹姆斯·林德联盟压疮重点确定合作项目所采用方法的思考
Res Involv Engagem. 2016 Apr 2;2:12. doi: 10.1186/s40900-016-0026-y. eCollection 2016.
5
What matters to you? Engaging with children in the James Lind Alliance Children's Cancer Priority Setting Partnership.对你来说什么重要?参与詹姆斯·林德联盟儿童癌症优先事项设定合作项目中的儿童相关工作。
Res Involv Engagem. 2023 Nov 30;9(1):110. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00518-2.
6
Adapting the James Lind Alliance priority setting process to better support patient participation: an example from cystic fibrosis.调整詹姆斯·林德联盟的优先事项设定流程以更好地支持患者参与:来自囊性纤维化的一个例子。
Res Involv Engagem. 2019 Aug 20;5:24. doi: 10.1186/s40900-019-0159-x. eCollection 2019.
7
How should multiple myeloma research change in a patient-oriented world? Findings and lessons from the pan-Canadian myeloma priority setting partnership.在以患者为导向的世界中,多发性骨髓瘤研究应如何改变?来自泛加拿大骨髓瘤优先事项设定伙伴关系的发现与经验教训。
Res Involv Engagem. 2023 Jul 29;9(1):60. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00476-9.
8
Partnering with survivors & families to determine research priorities for adult out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership.与幸存者及家属合作确定成人院外心脏骤停的研究重点:一项詹姆斯·林德联盟优先事项设定合作项目
Resusc Plus. 2021 Jul 7;7:100148. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2021.100148. eCollection 2021 Sep.
9
Establishing the Top 10 Research Priorities for Adolescent and Young Adult (AYA) Cancer in Canada: A Protocol for a James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership.确立加拿大青少年和青年癌症的前 10 项研究重点:一项詹姆斯林德联盟优先事项伙伴关系的方案。
Curr Oncol. 2024 May 17;31(5):2874-2880. doi: 10.3390/curroncol31050219.
10
Identifying trial recruitment uncertainties using a James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership - the PRioRiTy (Prioritising Recruitment in Randomised Trials) study.利用詹姆斯·林德联盟优先事项设定合作项目确定试验招募的不确定性——PRioRiTy(随机试验中的招募优先排序)研究
Trials. 2018 Mar 1;19(1):147. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2544-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Incorporating the voice of young people in mental health research: reflections from three lived experience advisory panels in Latin America.让年轻人的声音融入心理健康研究:来自拉丁美洲三个有实际经历咨询小组的思考。
Res Involv Engagem. 2025 Apr 17;11(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s40900-025-00703-5.
2
WHO framework on meaningful engagement: A transformational approach to integrate lived experience in the noncommunicable disease and mental health agenda.世界卫生组织有意义参与框架:将生活经验融入非传染性疾病和精神卫生议程的变革性方法。
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2024 May 29;4(5):e0002312. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0002312. eCollection 2024.
3

本文引用的文献

1
The top research questions asked by people with lived depression experience in Alberta: a survey.艾伯塔省有抑郁症生活经历者提出的首要研究问题:一项调查。
CMAJ Open. 2018 Sep 28;6(3):E398-E405. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20180034. Print 2018 Jul-Sep.
2
Patient and public engagement in priority setting: A systematic rapid review of the literature.患者和公众参与优先事项设定:文献系统快速综述。
PLoS One. 2018 Mar 2;13(3):e0193579. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0193579. eCollection 2018.
3
Patient engagement in Canada: a scoping review of the 'how' and 'what' of patient engagement in health research.
Lived experience and family engagement in psychiatry research: A scoping review of reviews.
精神科研究中的生活体验和家庭参与:综述的综述范围界定。
Health Expect. 2024 Jun;27(3):e14057. doi: 10.1111/hex.14057.
4
From a Single Voice to Diversity: Reframing 'Representation' in Patient Engagement.从单一声音到多样性:重新定义患者参与中的“代表性”。
Qual Health Res. 2024 Sep;34(11):1007-1018. doi: 10.1177/10497323231221674. Epub 2024 Jan 16.
5
Methodological procedures for priority setting mental health research: a systematic review summarising the methods, designs and frameworks involved with priority setting.优先设置心理健康研究的方法学程序:一项系统综述,总结了优先设置所涉及的方法、设计和框架。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2023 Jun 26;21(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s12961-023-01003-8.
6
Exploring the impact of engagement in mental health and substance use research: A scoping review and thematic analysis.探索参与精神健康和物质使用研究的影响:范围综述和主题分析。
Health Expect. 2023 Oct;26(5):1806-1819. doi: 10.1111/hex.13779. Epub 2023 Jun 6.
7
Research evidence and implementation gaps in the engagement of people with lived experience in mental health and substance use research: a scoping review.有过精神健康和物质使用经历的人群参与心理健康和物质使用研究的研究证据与实施差距:一项范围综述
Res Involv Engagem. 2023 May 11;9(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00442-5.
8
Comparing an in-person workshop and a postal Delphi survey for involving health service users in health care and health research prioritization.比较面对面研讨会和邮寄德尔菲调查在卫生服务使用者参与医疗保健和卫生研究重点排序中的应用。
Health Expect. 2023 Feb;26(1):199-212. doi: 10.1111/hex.13646. Epub 2022 Nov 8.
9
Keeping the Agenda Current: Evolution of Australian Lived Experience Mental Health Research Priorities.保持议程的时效性:澳大利亚生活体验心理健康研究重点的演变。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jul 1;19(13):8101. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19138101.
10
What are the respiratory health research priorities in Alberta, Canada? A stakeholder consultation.加拿大艾伯塔省的呼吸健康研究重点有哪些?利益相关者磋商。
BMJ Open. 2022 Jun 23;12(6):e059326. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059326.
加拿大的患者参与:对健康研究中患者参与的“方式”和“内容”的范围综述。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2018 Feb 7;16(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s12961-018-0282-4.
4
A framework for public involvement at the design stage of NHS health and social care research: time to develop ethically conscious standards.英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)健康与社会护理研究设计阶段的公众参与框架:制定具有道德意识的标准的时候到了。
Res Involv Engagem. 2017 Apr 4;3:6. doi: 10.1186/s40900-017-0058-y. eCollection 2017.
5
Exploring the challenge of health research priority setting in partnership: reflections on the methodology used by the James Lind Alliance Pressure Ulcer Priority Setting Partnership.探索合作中确定卫生研究重点的挑战:对詹姆斯·林德联盟压疮重点确定合作项目所采用方法的思考
Res Involv Engagem. 2016 Apr 2;2:12. doi: 10.1186/s40900-016-0026-y. eCollection 2016.
6
How are PCORI-funded researchers engaging patients in research and what are the ethical implications?患者为中心的结果研究所(PCORI)资助的研究人员如何让患者参与研究,以及其中的伦理意义是什么?
AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2017 Jan-Mar;8(1):1-10. doi: 10.1080/23294515.2016.1206045. Epub 2016 Jun 28.
7
Patient and Researcher Engagement in Health Research: A Parent's Perspective.患者与研究者参与健康研究:一位家长的视角
Pediatrics. 2017 Sep;140(3). doi: 10.1542/peds.2016-4127.
8
GRIPP2 reporting checklists: tools to improve reporting of patient and public involvement in research.GRIPP2报告清单:改善患者和公众参与研究报告的工具。
BMJ. 2017 Aug 2;358:j3453. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j3453.
9
Setting Research Priorities for Kidney Cancer.制定肾癌研究重点。
Eur Urol. 2017 Dec;72(6):861-864. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.04.011. Epub 2017 May 8.
10
Engaging patients in health research: identifying research priorities through community town halls.让患者参与健康研究:通过社区市政厅会议确定研究重点。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Mar 11;17(1):192. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2138-y.