Davis L J, Morse R M
Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55905.
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 1991 Mar;15(2):155-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.1991.tb01846.x.
The equivalence of paper-and-pencil-administered and computer-administered versions of the Self-Administered Alcoholism Screening Test (SAAST) was investigated with alcoholic inpatients and nonalcoholic psychiatric outpatients. When the two formats were administered in counterbalanced order, total score mean differences were nonsignificant. In addition, mean differences on a short-form version were also nonsignificant. Equivalence was also determined by comparing the two formats in terms of classification agreement (i.e., classification of subjects into alcoholic and nonalcoholic categories). Agreement between the two formats was 95% in both the total score and short-form versions. Implications of these results as well as the advantages and disadvantages of using computer-administered alcoholism screening tests are discussed.
对酒精成瘾住院患者和非酒精成瘾精神科门诊患者，研究了纸笔版和计算机版自我管理酒精成瘾筛查测试（SAAST）的等效性。当以平衡顺序使用这两种形式进行测试时，总分平均差异不显著。此外，简版的平均差异也不显著。通过比较两种形式在分类一致性方面（即将受试者分为酒精成瘾和非酒精成瘾类别）来确定等效性。两种形式在总分版和简版中的一致性均为95%。讨论了这些结果的意义以及使用计算机管理酒精成瘾筛查测试的优缺点。
