Suppr超能文献

Substance use disorder diagnostic schedule (SUDDS): the equivalence and validity of a computer-administered and an interviewer-administered format.

作者信息

Davis L J, Hoffmann N G, Morse R M, Luehr J G

机构信息

Section of Psychology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905.

出版信息

Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 1992 Apr;16(2):250-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.1992.tb01371.x.

Abstract

In order to evaluate the equivalence of interviewer-administered and computer-administered forms of the substance use disorder diagnostic schedule (SUDDS), both forms were presented to 100 substance-dependent inpatients. An additional 101 psychiatric outpatients were administered one form or the other. For patients who received both forms of the SUDDS, the percentage agreement ranged from 96% for the classification of a lifetime diagnosis of alcohol abuse/dependence to 88% for the classification of current diagnosis of alcohol abuse/dependence (kappa coefficients ranged from 0.709 to 0.865). Overall agreement with a clinician diagnosis (validity) and the two forms of administration varied from 100% for computer-generated diagnosis of current alcohol abuse/dependence to 71% for computer-generated lifetime diagnosis of drug abuse/dependence, when stratified by number of symptoms reported. No consistent differences were found in the performances of the two forms of the SUDDS, and we conclude that they may be used interchangeably.

摘要

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验