Suppr超能文献

多学科癌症会议:探索其实施的障碍和促进因素。

Multidisciplinary cancer conferences: exploring obstacles and facilitators to their implementation.

机构信息

Departments of Health Policy Management and Evaluation and Surgery, University of Toronto; Departments of Surgical and Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre; and Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

J Oncol Pract. 2010 Mar;6(2):61-8. doi: 10.1200/JOP.091085.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Multidisciplinary cancer conferences (MCCs) provide an opportunity for health professionals to discuss diagnosis and treatment options to optimize patient management. The purpose of this study was to explore the barriers and facilitators in implementing MCCs in Canada.

METHODS

This exploratory study used qualitative interviews and observation to explore the experiences of implementing MCCs in four hospitals in Ontario, Canada. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analyzed using standard qualitative research methodology guided by grounded theory principles.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven MCCs for gastrointestinal cancer were observed across three hospital sites, and 48 interviews were conducted among a range of clinical specialists and administrators. The dominant theme suggested that MCCs can most effectively be implemented if administrators and health professionals see value in MCCs, despite the time and effort required. A number of factors (eg, provincial policy, hospital administrative and clinician support, and an efficient MCC process) influenced whether MCCs were valued.

CONCLUSION

Variation exists in the enthusiasm of health professionals and the administrative capacity of institutions regarding routine implementation of MCCs. A systematic implementation plan for MCCs is needed involving both cancer care providers and administrators.

摘要

目的

多学科癌症会议(MCC)为卫生专业人员提供了一个讨论诊断和治疗方案的机会,以优化患者管理。本研究旨在探讨在加拿大实施 MCC 的障碍和促进因素。

方法

本探索性研究使用定性访谈和观察来探讨在加拿大安大略省的四家医院实施 MCC 的经验。访谈逐字记录,并使用扎根理论原则指导的标准定性研究方法进行分析。

结果

在三个医院现场观察了 37 次胃肠道癌症 MCC,对一系列临床专家和管理人员进行了 48 次访谈。主要主题表明,如果管理人员和卫生专业人员认为 MCC 有价值,尽管需要时间和精力,MCC 就能最有效地实施。一些因素(例如省级政策、医院行政和临床医生的支持以及高效的 MCC 流程)影响了 MCC 是否有价值。

结论

卫生专业人员的积极性和机构的行政能力在常规实施 MCC 方面存在差异。需要制定一个涉及癌症护理提供者和管理人员的 MCC 系统实施计划。

相似文献

2
Multidisciplinary cancer conferences: identifying opportunities to promote implementation.
Ann Surg Oncol. 2009 Oct;16(10):2731-7. doi: 10.1245/s10434-009-0639-6. Epub 2009 Aug 7.
3
Multidisciplinary cancer conferences: exploring the attitudes of cancer care providers and administrators.
J Interprof Care. 2009 Nov;23(6):599-610. doi: 10.3109/13561820902921829.
4
Multidisciplinary cancer conferences: a systematic review and development of practice standards.
Eur J Cancer. 2007 Apr;43(6):1002-10. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2007.01.025. Epub 2007 Feb 27.
5
6
Improving multidisciplinary cancer conferences: a population-based intervention.
Ann Surg Oncol. 2014 Jan;21(1):16-21. doi: 10.1245/s10434-013-3296-8. Epub 2013 Oct 2.
8
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.

引用本文的文献

3
Pathways for non-manufacturers to drive generic drug repurposing for cancer in the U.S.
Front Pharmacol. 2024 Oct 9;15:1419772. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1419772. eCollection 2024.
5
Multidisciplinary team meetings in Hematology: a national mixed-methods study.
BMC Cancer. 2023 Oct 7;23(1):950. doi: 10.1186/s12885-023-11431-y.
6
Survival Impact of an Enhanced Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Conference in a Regional Community Health Care System.
JTO Clin Res Rep. 2021 Jul 3;2(8):100203. doi: 10.1016/j.jtocrr.2021.100203. eCollection 2021 Aug.
7
Evaluating A Multidisciplinary Cancer Conference Checklist: Practice Versus Perceptions.
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2019 Nov 1;12:883-891. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S219854. eCollection 2019.
8
Scoping clinicians' perspectives on pre-treatment multidisciplinary care for young women with breast cancer.
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2018 Oct 9;11:547-555. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S173735. eCollection 2018.

本文引用的文献

1
Interdisciplinary tumour boards in Switzerland: quo vadis?
Swiss Med Wkly. 2008 Mar 8;138(9-10):123-7. doi: 10.4414/smw.2008.12078.
2
How to implement the multidisciplinary approach in prostate cancer management: the Belgian model.
BJU Int. 2008 Mar;101 Suppl 2:2-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2007.07489.x.
4
Determinants of implementation effectiveness: adapting a framework for complex innovations.
Med Care Res Rev. 2007 Jun;64(3):279-303. doi: 10.1177/1077558707299887.
5
Multidisciplinary cancer conferences: a systematic review and development of practice standards.
Eur J Cancer. 2007 Apr;43(6):1002-10. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2007.01.025. Epub 2007 Feb 27.
6
Multidisciplinary approach to the management of breast cancer in Hong Kong.
World J Surg. 2006 Dec;30(12):2095-100. doi: 10.1007/s00268-005-0370-9.
8
Receipt of recommended therapy by patients with advanced colorectal cancer.
Am J Gastroenterol. 2006 Jun;101(6):1320-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00545.x.
9
Surgeons' views on multi-disciplinary breast meetings.
Eur J Cancer. 2006 May;42(7):905-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2005.12.014. Epub 2006 Mar 3.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验