Jia Jie, Sun Tao, Tang Jiamin, Sun Kaidi, Meng Zhengnan, Zhu Hailong, Huang Xianhong
Department of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, 311121, People's Republic of China.
Department of Sociology, School of Public Administration, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, 311121, People's Republic of China.
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2024 Sep 7;17:4397-4409. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S473675. eCollection 2024.
Healthcare professionals' participation is crucial for the efficient implementation of multidisciplinary team (MDT) collaboration models. We identified the key factors influencing healthcare professionals' preference to participate in MDTs in tertiary hospitals.
To clarify the attributes and levels of the discrete choice experiment (DCE), we conducted a targeted literature review and conducted in-depth interviews with MDT service providers. Following this, a DCE was designed to evaluate healthcare professionals' preferences for MDT participation, and the influence of factors such as salary subsidies, leadership attention, patient participation, quality assessment, working intensity, and case complexity. A conditional logit model estimated the utility of each attribute. Willingness-to-pay estimates were derived by taking the negative ratio of the coefficients of non-economic and economic attributes. A series of policy simulation analyses were conducted.
Two hundred healthcare professionals completed the questionnaire, with 180 valid responses used for analysis. All attributes were statistically significant. Leadership attention and working intensity were the primary factors influencing staff willingness to participate in MDTs, followed by quality assessment and salary subsidies. Significant preference differences were observed between respondents; compared with mid-level staff, senior-level healthcare professionals believed patient engagement would be more helpful in boosting participation. The policy simulation showed that changing leadership attention from "neglect" to "emphasis" would increase the probability of staff choosing to participate in MDTs from 24.4% to 66.98%.
Leadership attention was the primary concern for healthcare professionals in MDTs. To effectively motivate staff participation in MDTs, policymakers should adopt a holistic approach that considers work motivation and individual backgrounds, including competitive salary packages and a positive work environment. They should concurrently introduce MDT case complexity measurement tools to optimize resource allocation. Addressing staff members' unique needs and career aspirations by creating targeted training programs, pathways for advancement, and personalized career development plans are also crucial.
医疗保健专业人员的参与对于多学科团队(MDT)协作模式的有效实施至关重要。我们确定了影响三级医院医疗保健专业人员参与MDT偏好的关键因素。
为了阐明离散选择实验(DCE)的属性和水平,我们进行了有针对性的文献综述,并对MDT服务提供者进行了深入访谈。在此之后,设计了一个DCE来评估医疗保健专业人员参与MDT的偏好,以及诸如薪资补贴、领导关注、患者参与、质量评估、工作强度和病例复杂性等因素的影响。条件logit模型估计了每个属性的效用。通过取非经济和经济属性系数的负比率得出支付意愿估计值。进行了一系列政策模拟分析。
200名医疗保健专业人员完成了问卷,其中180份有效回复用于分析。所有属性均具有统计学意义。领导关注和工作强度是影响员工参与MDT意愿的主要因素,其次是质量评估和薪资补贴。受访者之间观察到显著的偏好差异;与中级员工相比,高级医疗保健专业人员认为患者参与对提高参与度更有帮助。政策模拟表明,将领导关注从“忽视”转变为“重视”将使员工选择参与MDT的概率从24.4%提高到66.98%。
领导关注是MDT中医疗保健专业人员的首要关注点。为了有效激励员工参与MDT,政策制定者应采取全面的方法,考虑工作动机和个人背景,包括有竞争力的薪资待遇和积极的工作环境。他们应同时引入MDT病例复杂性测量工具以优化资源分配。通过创建有针对性的培训计划、晋升途径和个性化的职业发展计划来满足员工的独特需求和职业抱负也至关重要。