Yang Kai-Ning, Chen Shu-Chen, Chen Shu-Yueh, Chang Chao-Hsiang, Wu Hsi-Chin, Chou Eric Chieh-Lung
Bureau Public Health, Yunlin County, Taiwan, Republic of China.
Int Urogynecol J. 2010 Nov;21(11):1371-6. doi: 10.1007/s00192-010-1204-3. Epub 2010 Jul 1.
This study investigated the effect of sitting and non-sitting postures on uroflowmetric parameters and postvoid residual urine (PVR) and women's preferred voiding posture.
Female university students (N = 45) voided on a modified sitting-type toilet in three postures: sitting, semi-squatting, and crouching over. Data on uroflowmetric measures were collected using a weight transducer urodynamic device and PVR was estimated by transabdominal ultrasound.
Voiding in the three postures did not differ in terms of PVR and five of six uroflowmetric outcomes. However, "delay time to void" was significantly longer while semi-squatting than while sitting and crouching over. Furthermore, 51.1% of women had bell-shaped urinary flow curves while sitting, whereas only 22.2% and 17.8% did while semi-squatting and crouching over, respectively. Most women (88.9%) preferred a non-sitting posture when using a public sitting-type toilet.
Women's preferred non-sitting void posture on public sitting-type toilet should be a concern.
本研究调查了坐姿和非坐姿对尿流率参数、排尿后残余尿量(PVR)以及女性偏好的排尿姿势的影响。
45名女大学生在改良的坐式马桶上以三种姿势排尿:坐姿、半蹲姿和蹲姿。使用重量传感器尿动力学装置收集尿流率测量数据,并通过经腹超声估计PVR。
三种姿势排尿在PVR和六项尿流率指标中的五项上没有差异。然而,半蹲时的“排尿延迟时间”明显长于坐姿和蹲姿。此外,51.1%的女性坐姿排尿时尿流曲线呈钟形,而半蹲和蹲姿排尿时分别只有22.2%和17.8%呈钟形。大多数女性(88.9%)在使用公共坐式马桶时更喜欢非坐姿。
女性在公共坐式马桶上偏好的非坐姿排尿姿势值得关注。