School of Physiotherapy, Australian Catholic University, McCauley Campus, PO Box 456, Virginia, QLD, 4014, Australia.
Eur Spine J. 2011 May;20(5):808-18. doi: 10.1007/s00586-010-1491-x. Epub 2010 Jul 1.
Microgravity and inactivity due to prolonged bed rest have been shown to result in atrophy of spinal extensor muscles such as the multifidus, and either no atrophy or hypertrophy of flexor muscles such as the abdominal group and psoas muscle. These effects are long-lasting after bed rest and the potential effects of rehabilitation are unknown. This two-group intervention study aimed to investigate the effects of two rehabilitation programs on the recovery of lumbo-pelvic musculature following prolonged bed rest. 24 subjects underwent 60 days of head down tilt bed rest as part of the 2nd Berlin BedRest Study (BBR2-2). After bed rest, they underwent one of two exercise programs, trunk flexor and general strength (TFS) training or specific motor control (SMC) training. Magnetic resonance imaging of the lumbo-pelvic region was conducted at the start and end of bed rest and during the recovery period (14 and 90 days after re-ambulation). Cross-sectional areas (CSAs) of the multifidus, psoas, lumbar erector spinae and quadratus lumborum muscles were measured from L1 to L5. Morphological changes including disc volume, spinal length, lordosis angle and disc height were also measured. Both exercise programs restored the multifidus muscle to pre-bed-rest size, but further increases in psoas muscle size were seen in the TFS group up to 14 days after bed rest. There was no significant difference in the number of low back pain reports for the two rehabilitation groups (p=.59). The TFS program resulted in greater decreases in disc volume and anterior disc height. The SMC training program may be preferable to TFS training after bed rest as it restored the CSA of the multifidus muscle without generating potentially harmful compressive forces through the spine.
微重力和长期卧床导致的不活动已被证明会导致脊柱伸肌(如多裂肌)萎缩,而屈肌(如腹肌和腰大肌)则不会出现萎缩或肥大。卧床休息后这些影响是持久的,康复的潜在影响尚不清楚。这项两组成员干预研究旨在探讨两种康复方案对长期卧床后腰骨盆肌肉恢复的影响。24 名受试者参加了第 2 届柏林卧床休息研究(BBR2-2)的 60 天头低位卧床休息。卧床休息后,他们接受了两种运动方案之一,躯干屈肌和一般力量(TFS)训练或特定运动控制(SMC)训练。在卧床休息开始和结束时以及恢复期间(重新站立后 14 天和 90 天)对腰骨盆区域进行磁共振成像。从 L1 到 L5 测量多裂肌、腰大肌、腰椎竖脊肌和腰方肌的横截面积(CSA)。还测量了包括椎间盘体积、脊柱长度、脊柱前凸角和椎间盘高度在内的形态变化。两种运动方案都使多裂肌肌肉恢复到卧床前的大小,但 TFS 组在卧床休息后 14 天内,腰大肌的大小进一步增加。两组康复组的腰痛报告数量没有显著差异(p=.59)。TFS 方案导致椎间盘体积和前椎间盘高度的减少更大。SMC 训练方案可能优于 TFS 训练方案,因为它恢复了多裂肌 CSA,而不会通过脊柱产生潜在有害的压缩力。