Suppr超能文献

团体听力康复活动会影响心理社会结果吗?

Do group audiologic rehabilitation activities influence psychosocial outcomes?

作者信息

Preminger Jill E, Yoo Jae K

机构信息

University of Louisville School of Medicine, KY 40292, USA.

出版信息

Am J Audiol. 2010 Dec;19(2):109-25. doi: 10.1044/1059-0889(2010/09-0027). Epub 2010 Jul 1.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To attempt to determine whether group audiologic rehabilitation (AR) content affected psychosocial outcomes.

METHOD

A randomized controlled trial with at least 17 participants per group was completed. The 3 treatment groups included a communication strategies training group, a communication strategies training plus psychosocial exercise group, and an informational lecture plus psychosocial exercise group. Evaluations were conducted preclass, postclass, and 6-months postclass; they included hearing loss-related and generic quality of life scales, and a class evaluation form.

RESULTS

All treatment groups demonstrated short- and long-term improvement on the hearing loss-related quality of life scale. Minimal differences were measured across treatment groups. A significant difference was observed between the lecture plus psychosocial exercise group and the communication strategies training group for 1 hearing loss-related quality of life subscale. Better outcomes were measured for the 2 groups with psychosocial exercises versus the communication strategies training group on 1 generic quality of life subscale. The results for the class evaluation did not discriminate among the treatment groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Class content had only a minimal influence on treatment outcomes. Recommended AR class content includes a mix of interventions including information, training, and psychosocial exercises.

摘要

目的

试图确定小组听力康复(AR)内容是否会影响心理社会结局。

方法

完成了一项随机对照试验,每组至少有17名参与者。3个治疗组包括一个沟通策略训练组、一个沟通策略训练加心理社会锻炼组和一个信息讲座加心理社会锻炼组。在课程前、课程后和课程后6个月进行评估;评估内容包括与听力损失相关的生活质量量表、通用生活质量量表以及一份课程评估表。

结果

所有治疗组在与听力损失相关的生活质量量表上均显示出短期和长期的改善。各治疗组之间的差异极小。在一个与听力损失相关的生活质量子量表上,讲座加心理社会锻炼组与沟通策略训练组之间存在显著差异。在一个通用生活质量子量表上,与沟通策略训练组相比,进行心理社会锻炼的两组取得了更好的结果。课程评估结果在各治疗组之间没有区分度。

结论

课程内容对治疗结果的影响微乎其微。推荐的AR课程内容包括信息、训练和心理社会锻炼等多种干预措施。

相似文献

1
Do group audiologic rehabilitation activities influence psychosocial outcomes?
Am J Audiol. 2010 Dec;19(2):109-25. doi: 10.1044/1059-0889(2010/09-0027). Epub 2010 Jul 1.
2
Evaluation of an audiological rehabilitation program for spouses of people with hearing loss.
J Am Acad Audiol. 2010 May;21(5):315-28. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.21.5.4.
3
Interventions to improve hearing aid use in adult auditory rehabilitation.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jul 12(7):CD010342. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010342.pub2.
5
Should significant others be encouraged to join adult group audiologic rehabilitation classes?
J Am Acad Audiol. 2003 Dec;14(10):545-55. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.14.10.3.
6
Short- and long-term outcomes of adult audiological rehabilitation.
Ear Hear. 2004 Oct;25(5):464-77. doi: 10.1097/01.aud.0000145114.24651.4e.
7
Can auditory and visual speech perception be trained within a group setting?
Am J Audiol. 2008 Jun;17(1):80-97. doi: 10.1044/1059-0889(2008/009).

引用本文的文献

3
Qualitative research methods to investigate communication within a group aural rehabilitation intervention.
Int J Audiol. 2019 Oct;58(10):651-660. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2019.1608377. Epub 2019 Jul 22.
5
The Chronic Care Model and Chronic Condition Self-Management: An Introduction for Audiologists.
Semin Hear. 2019 Feb;40(1):7-25. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1676780. Epub 2019 Feb 5.
6
User-Innovated eHealth Solutions for Service Delivery to Older Persons With Hearing Impairment.
Am J Audiol. 2018 Nov 19;27(3S):403-416. doi: 10.1044/2018_AJA-IMIA3-18-0009.
8
Interventions to improve hearing aid use in adult auditory rehabilitation.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Aug 18;2016(8):CD010342. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010342.pub3.

本文引用的文献

1
Hearing Rehabilitation For Deafened Adults - A Psychosocial Approach.
Cochlear Implants Int. 2004 Jan;5(1):41. doi: 10.1080/14670100.2004.11873750.
2
Can auditory and visual speech perception be trained within a group setting?
Am J Audiol. 2008 Jun;17(1):80-97. doi: 10.1044/1059-0889(2008/009).
3
Coping with diabetes in adulthood: a meta-analysis.
J Behav Med. 2008 Aug;31(4):291-300. doi: 10.1007/s10865-008-9155-6. Epub 2008 May 21.
9
The WHO-DAS II: measuring outcomes of hearing aid intervention for adults.
Trends Amplif. 2005;9(3):127-43. doi: 10.1177/108471380500900304.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验