• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

瘢痕量表及瘢痕测量装置综述。

A review of scar scales and scar measuring devices.

作者信息

Fearmonti Regina, Bond Jennifer, Erdmann Detlev, Levinson Howard

出版信息

Eplasty. 2010 Jun 21;10:e43.

PMID:20596233
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2890387/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Pathologic scarring affects millions of people worldwide. Quantitative and qualitative measurement modalities are needed to effectively evaluate and monitor treatments.

METHODS

This article reviews the literature on available tools and existent assessment scales used to subjectively and objectively characterize scar.

RESULTS

We describe the attributes and deficiencies of each tool and scale and highlight areas where further development is critical.

CONCLUSION

An optimal, universal scar scoring system is needed in order to better characterize, understand and treat pathologic scarring.

摘要

目的

病理性瘢痕影响着全球数百万人。需要定量和定性的测量方法来有效评估和监测治疗效果。

方法

本文回顾了有关用于主观和客观描述瘢痕的现有工具和现有评估量表的文献。

结果

我们描述了每种工具和量表的特点与不足,并强调了亟待进一步发展的领域。

结论

为了更好地表征、理解和治疗病理性瘢痕,需要一种最佳的通用瘢痕评分系统。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bfbe/2890387/c29dfe47e7bc/eplasty10e43_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bfbe/2890387/c29dfe47e7bc/eplasty10e43_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bfbe/2890387/c29dfe47e7bc/eplasty10e43_fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
A review of scar scales and scar measuring devices.瘢痕量表及瘢痕测量装置综述。
Eplasty. 2010 Jun 21;10:e43.
2
Measurement of vascularity in the scar: A systematic review.瘢痕组织中血管生成的测量:系统评价。
Burns. 2019 Sep;45(6):1253-1265. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2018.10.026. Epub 2018 Dec 10.
3
Noninvasive Objective Tools for Quantitative Assessment of Skin Scarring.无创性客观工具用于定量评估皮肤瘢痕。
Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle). 2022 Mar;11(3):132-149. doi: 10.1089/wound.2020.1387. Epub 2021 Aug 24.
4
A review of scar assessment scales.瘢痕评估量表综述。
Semin Cutan Med Surg. 2015 Mar;34(1):28-36. doi: 10.12788/j.sder.2015.0125.
5
Acne Scars: How Do We Grade Them?痤疮疤痕:我们如何分级?
Am J Clin Dermatol. 2018 Apr;19(2):139-144. doi: 10.1007/s40257-017-0321-x.
6
Burn scar assessment: a systematic review of different scar scales.烧伤瘢痕评估:不同瘢痕量表的系统评价。
J Surg Res. 2010 Nov;164(1):e115-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2010.05.056. Epub 2010 Jun 16.
7
A prospective randomized evaluation of scar assessment measures.瘢痕评估措施的前瞻性随机评估。
Laryngoscope. 2009 May;119(5):841-5. doi: 10.1002/lary.20139.
8
Novel Stereoscopic Optical System for Objectively Measuring Above-Surface Scar Volume-First-Time Quantification of Responses to Various Treatment Modalities.用于客观测量表面上方瘢痕体积的新型立体光学系统——首次对各种治疗方式的反应进行量化
Dermatol Surg. 2018 Jun;44(6):848-854. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000001434.
9
Laser treatment of specific scar characteristics in hypertrophic scars and keloid: A systematic review.激光治疗增生性瘢痕和瘢痕疙瘩的特定瘢痕特征:系统评价。
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2021 Jan;74(1):48-64. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2020.08.108. Epub 2020 Sep 20.
10
Development and validation of a Scale for Acne Scar Severity (SCAR-S) of the face and trunk.面部和躯干痤疮瘢痕严重程度量表(SCAR-S)的制定和验证。
J Cutan Med Surg. 2010 Jul-Aug;14(4):156-60. doi: 10.2310/7750.2010.09037.

引用本文的文献

1
Photobiomodulation therapy for enhanced wound and Scar healing: visual and statistical evaluation.用于促进伤口和瘢痕愈合的光生物调节疗法:视觉和统计学评估。
Lasers Med Sci. 2025 Aug 13;40(1):334. doi: 10.1007/s10103-025-04587-5.
2
Factors Influencing Reduced Scar Tissue Formation Following Unilateral Cleft Lip Plastic Surgeries: a Systematic Literature Review.单侧唇裂整形术后瘢痕组织形成减少的影响因素:一项系统文献综述
J Oral Maxillofac Res. 2025 Jun 30;16(2):e1. doi: 10.5037/jomr.2025.16202. eCollection 2025 Apr-Jun.
3
A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparison of Subcuticular Suture and Adhesive Strip for Cosmetic Outcome in Median Sternotomy Closure in Patient Undergoing Cardiac Surgery.

本文引用的文献

1
How to assess postsurgical scars: a review of outcome measures.如何评估手术后疤痕:结局测量指标的综述。
Disabil Rehabil. 2009;31(25):2055-63. doi: 10.3109/09638280902874196.
2
Development of a new visual analogue scale for the assessment of area scars.一种用于评估瘢痕面积的新型视觉模拟量表的研制。
J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2009 Feb;38(1):77-89.
3
Current scales for assessing human scarring: a review.当前评估人类瘢痕形成的量表:综述
皮下缝合与粘贴条用于心脏手术患者正中胸骨切开术闭合美容效果的随机对照试验比较
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2025 Jun 5. doi: 10.1007/s00266-025-04885-x.
4
Intralesional injection of vitamin D3, platelet rich plasma versus their combination in treatment of keloid: a clinical, radiological and immunohistochemical study.病灶内注射维生素D3、富血小板血浆及其联合治疗瘢痕疙瘩的临床、放射学及免疫组织化学研究
Arch Dermatol Res. 2025 May 20;317(1):773. doi: 10.1007/s00403-025-04244-5.
5
LINC01711 modulates proliferation, migration, and extracellular matrix deposition of hypertrophic scar fibroblasts by targeting miR-34a-5p.LINC01711通过靶向miR-34a-5p调节增生性瘢痕成纤维细胞的增殖、迁移和细胞外基质沉积。
Arch Dermatol Res. 2025 Apr 25;317(1):736. doi: 10.1007/s00403-025-04200-3.
6
A Retrospective Analysis of the Effectiveness of Fractional CO₂ Laser Therapy in Treating Linear Scars: Investigating the Ideal Timing for Intervention.剥脱性二氧化碳激光治疗线性瘢痕有效性的回顾性分析:探究理想的干预时机
J Cosmet Dermatol. 2025 Mar;24(3):e70019. doi: 10.1111/jocd.70019.
7
A Comparative Analytical Study of Functional and Esthetic Outcomes of Infraorbital and Subciliary Incisions to Assess the Redundancy of the Infraorbital Approach.一项关于眶下切口和睫毛下切口功能及美学效果的比较分析研究,以评估眶下入路的冗余性
ScientificWorldJournal. 2025 Feb 10;2025:9595176. doi: 10.1155/tswj/9595176. eCollection 2025.
8
Comparative study of microneedling monotherapy versus microneedling with autologous platelet-rich plasma for the treatment of stretch marks (striae distensae) and post-surgical scars: Clinical and dermoscopy outcomes.微针单药疗法与微针联合自体富血小板血浆治疗膨胀纹(妊娠纹)和手术后瘢痕的对比研究:临床及皮肤镜检查结果
J Cutan Aesthet Surg. 2024 Oct-Dec;17(4):307-314. doi: 10.25259/jcas_45_23. Epub 2024 Oct 5.
9
Assessing the Influence of Hyaluronan Dressing on Wound Healing on Split-Thickness Skin Graft Donor Sites Using a Three-Dimensional Scanner.使用三维扫描仪评估透明质酸敷料对中厚皮片供皮区伤口愈合的影响。
J Clin Med. 2024 Oct 27;13(21):6433. doi: 10.3390/jcm13216433.
10
Korean Medicine Subcision Therapies in Scar Treatment: A Retrospective, Multicenter Study at Network Clinics.韩医学皮下分离疗法治疗瘢痕:一项在网络诊所开展的回顾性多中心研究
Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2024 Oct 25;17:2381-2389. doi: 10.2147/CCID.S470014. eCollection 2024.
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2009 Jun;62(6):713-20. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2009.01.080. Epub 2009 Mar 20.
4
Scar assessment scales: a dermatologic overview.瘢痕评估量表:皮肤病学概述。
Skin Res Technol. 2009 Feb;15(1):1-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0846.2008.00327.x.
5
Rho kinase-dependent CCL20 induced by dynamic compression of human chondrocytes.人软骨细胞动态压缩诱导的Rho激酶依赖性CCL20
Arthritis Rheum. 2008 Sep;58(9):2735-42. doi: 10.1002/art.23797.
6
Development and validation of a novel scar evaluation scale.一种新型瘢痕评估量表的开发与验证
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007 Dec;120(7):1892-1897. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000287275.15511.10.
7
A critical analysis of measurements used to assess and manage scars.对用于评估和处理瘢痕的测量方法的批判性分析。
Int J Low Extrem Wounds. 2007 Dec;6(4):249-53. doi: 10.1177/1534734607308249.
8
Reliability and validity testing of the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale in evaluating linear scars after breast cancer surgery.患者和观察者瘢痕评估量表在评估乳腺癌手术后线性瘢痕中的信度和效度测试
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007 Feb;119(2):487-94. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000252949.77525.bc.
9
Use of a non-contact 3D digitiser to measure the volume of keloid scars: a useful tool for scar assessment.使用非接触式三维数字化仪测量瘢痕疙瘩的体积:一种用于瘢痕评估的有用工具。
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2007;60(1):87-94. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2005.12.051. Epub 2006 Jun 12.
10
Visual analogue scale scoring and ranking: a suitable and sensitive method for assessing scar quality?视觉模拟评分法及排名:评估瘢痕质量的合适且敏感的方法?
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006 Sep 15;118(4):909-918. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000232378.88776.b0.