Halck S W, Walther-Larsen S, Sanchez R
Department of Anaesthesia, Gentotte Hospital, Hellerup.
Dan Med Bull. 1991 Apr;38(2):181-2.
Central venous pressure (CVP) recorded on electronic equipment (E-CVP) is compared with CVP measured by water column (W-CVP) in 50 patients after coronary bypass surgery without prior pulmonary symptoms. We find a statistically significant, but clinically insignificant, difference between E-CVP and W-CVP. Treatment with 10 cm H2O positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) causes a significant rise in CVP by increasing intrathoracic pressure, but as changes in CVP rather than a given value are of greater importance in the daily clinical situation, we do not consider it clinically important to interrupt treatment with PEEP in as much as only small changes in CVP are induced after application of PEEP.
在50例无既往肺部症状的冠状动脉搭桥手术后患者中,比较电子设备记录的中心静脉压(E-CVP)与水柱测量的中心静脉压(W-CVP)。我们发现E-CVP和W-CVP之间存在统计学上显著但临床上无显著意义的差异。使用10 cm H2O呼气末正压(PEEP)进行治疗会因增加胸内压而导致中心静脉压显著升高,但由于在日常临床情况中,中心静脉压的变化而非特定值更为重要,所以我们认为在应用PEEP后仅引起中心静脉压微小变化的情况下,中断PEEP治疗在临床上并不重要。