Suppr超能文献

如果一开始不成功,那就再试一次:理解重新测试分数提高中的种族、年龄和性别差异。

If at first you don't succeed, try, try again: understanding race, age, and gender differences in retesting score improvement.

机构信息

Krannert School of Management, Purdue University, 100 South Grant,West Lafayette, IN 47907-2076, USA.

出版信息

J Appl Psychol. 2010 Jul;95(4):603-17. doi: 10.1037/a0018920.

Abstract

This article explores the intersection of 2 critical and timely concerns in personnel selection-applicant retesting and subgroup differences-by exploring demographic differences in retest effects across multiple assessments. Results from large samples of applicants taking 3 written tests (N = 7,031) and 5 performance tests (N = 2,060) revealed that Whites showed larger retest score improvements than Blacks or Hispanics on several of the assessments. However, the differential improvement of Whites was greater on the written tests than on the performance tests. In addition, women and applicants under 40 years of age showed larger improvements with retesting than did men and applicants over 40. We offer some preliminary theoretical explanations for these demographic differences in retesting gains, including differences in ability, testing attitudes and motivation, and receptivity to feedback. In terms of practical implications, the results suggest that allowing applicants to retake selection tests may, in some cases, exacerbate levels of adverse impact, which can have distinct implications for retesting policy and practices in organizations.

摘要

本文探讨了人员选拔中两个关键且紧迫的问题的交集——申请人重测和子群体差异,通过探索多个评估中重测效果的人口统计学差异来实现。对参加 3 项笔试(N=7031)和 5 项绩效测试(N=2060)的大量申请人样本的结果表明,在几项评估中,白人的重测分数提高幅度大于黑人或西班牙裔。然而,与绩效测试相比,白人在笔试中的提高幅度更大。此外,与 40 岁以上的男性和申请人相比,女性和 40 岁以下的申请人的重测提高幅度更大。我们为这些重测收益中的人口统计学差异提供了一些初步的理论解释,包括能力、测试态度和动机以及对反馈的接受度方面的差异。在实际影响方面,结果表明,在某些情况下,允许申请人重测选拔测试可能会加剧负面影响的程度,这对组织中的重测政策和实践有明显的影响。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验