Department of Social and Organizational Psychology, Utrecht University.
School of Human Resource Management, North-West University.
J Occup Health Psychol. 2010 Jul;15(3):209-222. doi: 10.1037/a0019408.
This study among 528 South African employees working in the construction industry examined the dimensionality of burnout and work engagement, using the Maslach Burnout Inventory-General Survey, the Oldenburg Burnout Inventory, and the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale. On the basis of the literature, we predicted that cynicism and dedication are opposite ends of one underlying attitude dimension (called "identification"), and that exhaustion and vigor are opposite ends of one "energy" dimension. Confirmatory factor analyses showed that while the attitude constructs represent opposite ends of one continuum, the energy constructs do not-although they are highly correlated. These findings are also supported by the pattern of relationships between burnout and work engagement on the one hand, and predictors (i.e., work pressure, autonomy) and outcomes (i.e., organizational commitment, mental health) on the other hand. Implications for the measurement and conceptualization of burnout and work engagement are discussed.
本研究对南非建筑行业的 528 名员工进行了研究,使用了 Maslach 职业倦怠量表通用版、Oldenburg 职业倦怠量表和 Utrecht 工作投入量表,探讨了职业倦怠和工作投入的维度。基于文献,我们预测玩世不恭和投入是同一潜在态度维度(称为“认同”)的两个极端,而疲惫和活力是同一“能量”维度的两个极端。验证性因素分析表明,虽然态度构念代表了一个连续体的两个极端,但能量构念并非如此——尽管它们高度相关。这些发现也得到了职业倦怠和工作投入与其他方面(即工作压力、自主性)和结果(即组织承诺、心理健康)之间关系模式的支持。讨论了职业倦怠和工作投入的测量和概念化的意义。