• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Does screening classification predict long-term outcomes of DWI offenders?筛查分类能否预测酒驾违法者的长期后果？
Am J Health Behav. 2010 Nov-Dec;34(6):737-49. doi: 10.5993/ajhb.34.6.9.
2
Accuracy of alcohol diagnosis among DWI offenders referred for screening.接受筛查的酒驾犯罪者酒精诊断的准确性。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2004 Nov 11;76(2):135-41. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2004.04.020.
3
Concurrent and predictive validity of drug use and psychiatric diagnosis among first-time DWI offenders.首次酒驾犯罪者中药物使用与精神疾病诊断的同时效度和预测效度
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2007 Apr;31(4):619-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2007.00346.x.
4
Attitudes toward mandatory ignition interlocks for all offenders convicted of driving while intoxicated.对所有因醉酒驾车而被定罪的罪犯强制安装点火联锁装置的态度。
J Safety Res. 2017 Dec;63:99-103. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2017.08.002. Epub 2017 Aug 24.
5
Psychosocial characteristics of persons convicted of driving while intoxicated.因醉酒驾车而被定罪者的社会心理特征。
Psychol Rep. 1992 Jun;70(3 Pt 2):1123-30. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1992.70.3c.1123.
6
Treatment Needs of Driving While Intoxicated Offenders: The Need for a Multimodal Approach to Treatment.醉酒驾车罪犯的治疗需求：采用多模式治疗方法的必要性。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2015;16(7):637-44. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2015.1013189.
7
Towards a national model for managing impaired driving offenders.迈向全国性的酒驾罪犯管理模式。
Addiction. 2011 Jul;106(7):1221-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2010.03339.x. Epub 2011 Mar 11.
8
Decision-making capacities and affective reward anticipation in DWI recidivists compared to non-offenders: a preliminary study.DWI 累犯与非犯罪者的决策能力和情感奖励预期比较：一项初步研究。
Accid Anal Prev. 2012 Mar;45:580-7. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2011.09.012. Epub 2011 Nov 5.
9
Predicting multiple DUI offenders using the Florida DRI.使用佛罗里达 DUI 风险指数预测多次酒驾者。
Subst Use Misuse. 2011;46(5):696-703. doi: 10.3109/10826084.2010.529629. Epub 2010 Nov 2.
10
Are drunk-driving offenders referred for screening accurately reporting their drug use?因酒驾而被转介接受筛查的违法者是否如实报告了他们的药物使用情况？
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2002 May 1;66(3):243-53. doi: 10.1016/s0376-8716(02)00004-2.

引用本文的文献

1
Functioning of alcohol use disorder criteria among men and women with arrests for driving under the influence of alcohol.男性和女性因酒后驾车被捕者的酒精使用障碍标准的功能。
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2011 Nov;35(11):1985-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2011.01550.x. Epub 2011 Jun 1.
2
Convicted driving-while-impaired offenders' views on effectiveness of sanctions and treatment.被判有罪的驾驶时受影响的罪犯对制裁和治疗效果的看法。
Qual Health Res. 2012 Jan;22(1):17-30. doi: 10.1177/1049732311406450. Epub 2011 Apr 13.
3
The science of sustaining health behavior change: the health maintenance consortium.维持健康行为改变的科学：健康维护联盟。
Am J Health Behav. 2010 Nov-Dec;34(6):647-59. doi: 10.5993/ajhb.34.6.2.

本文引用的文献

1
Screening and brief intervention in the criminal justice system.刑事司法系统中的筛查与简短干预。
Alcohol Res Health. 2004;28(2):85-93.
2
Criminality and continued DUI offense: criminal typologies and recidivism among repeat offenders.犯罪行为与持续的酒驾犯罪：累犯中的犯罪类型与再犯情况。
Behav Sci Law. 2007;25(4):603-14. doi: 10.1002/bsl.769.
3
A randomized trial of a DWI intervention program for first offenders: intervention outcomes and interactions with antisocial personality disorder among a primarily American-Indian sample.一项针对初犯者的酒驾干预项目随机试验：在以美国印第安人为主的样本中的干预结果及与反社会人格障碍的相互作用
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2007 Jun;31(6):974-87. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2007.00380.x. Epub 2007 Mar 31.
4
Court-mandated treatment for convicted drinking drivers.法庭强制要求对醉酒驾车罪犯进行治疗。
Alcohol Res Health. 2006;29(1):41-8.
5
The prevalence of drinking and driving in the United States, 2001-2002: results from the national epidemiological survey on alcohol and related conditions.2001 - 2002年美国酒后驾车的患病率：酒精及相关状况全国流行病学调查结果
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2006 Jun 28;83(2):137-46. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2005.11.001. Epub 2005 Dec 20.
6
Performance of alcohol and safer sex change rulers compared with readiness to change questionnaires.将酒精和安全性行为改变量表与改变意愿问卷进行比较的表现。
Psychol Addict Behav. 2005 Mar;19(1):112-5. doi: 10.1037/0893-164X.19.1.112.
7
Recovery from DSM-IV alcohol dependence: United States, 2001-2002.从《精神疾病诊断与统计手册第四版》（DSM-IV）酒精依赖中康复：美国，2001 - 2002年。
Addiction. 2005 Mar;100(3):281-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2004.00964.x.
8
Accuracy of alcohol diagnosis among DWI offenders referred for screening.接受筛查的酒驾犯罪者酒精诊断的准确性。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2004 Nov 11;76(2):135-41. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2004.04.020.
9
The prevention paradox, traffic safety, and driving-while-intoxicated treatment.预防悖论、交通安全与酒后驾车治疗。
Am J Prev Med. 2004 Aug;27(2):106-11. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2004.04.012.
10
Use of substance abuse treatment services by persons with mental health and substance use problems.患有精神健康和物质使用问题的人对物质滥用治疗服务的使用情况。
Psychiatr Serv. 2003 Mar;54(3):363-9. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.54.3.363.

筛查分类能否预测酒驾违法者的长期后果？

Does screening classification predict long-term outcomes of DWI offenders?

作者信息

Lapham Sandra C, Skipper Betty J

机构信息

Behavioral Health Research Center of the Southwest, a center of the Pacific Institute for Research and Evaluation, 612 Encino Place NE, Albuquerque, NM 87102, USA.

出版信息

Am J Health Behav. 2010 Nov-Dec;34(6):737-49. doi: 10.5993/ajhb.34.6.9.

DOI:10.5993/ajhb.34.6.9
PMID:20604698
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2924758/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To determine the usefulness of a screening classification system in predicting treatment use, current substance abuse disorders (SUD), and driving over the alcohol limit (DOL) at 15-year follow-up.

METHODS

Interviewed 583 driving while imparied (DWI) first offenders with SUDs. Univariate and multivariate statistics were used to determine predictors of long-term outcomes.

RESULTS

Screening classification defined groups with different treatment histories and 15-year outcomes. Current SUDs were reported by 21% and DOL by 10%, of subjects.

CONCLUSIONS

Group differences suggest that screening data could be used more effectively to triage and treat DWI offenders.

摘要

目的

确定一种筛查分类系统在预测15年随访时的治疗使用情况、当前物质使用障碍（SUD）和酒后驾车（DOL）方面的效用。

方法

对583名患有物质使用障碍的初次酒后驾车（DWI）者进行访谈。采用单变量和多变量统计方法确定长期结果的预测因素。

结果

筛查分类定义了具有不同治疗史和15年结果的组。21%的受试者报告有当前物质使用障碍，10%的受试者报告有酒后驾车情况。

结论

组间差异表明，筛查数据可更有效地用于对酒后驾车者进行分类和治疗。