Animalia, PO 396, Okern, 0513 Oslo, Norway.
Res Vet Sci. 2011 Apr;90(2):352-7. doi: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2010.06.018.
From three in-depth focus group studies and an internet based study concerning consumers attitudes towards surgical castration of piglets and alternatives, it can be concluded that Norwegian consumers are content with the current practice of castration using local anaesthesia. They accept castration as a necessary means to prevent the risk of boar taint in meat and thereby secure meat quality. Even though castration using anaesthesia is not a perfect solution, it is considered sufficient, and the consumers do not ask for alternatives. Most consumers were sceptical of immunocastration. The scepticism was mainly based on the fear of residuals in meat and unknown long-term consequences for the consumers. On the other hand the confidence in Norwegian control authorities is considerable, and will probably contribute to the maintenance of purchase habits even if immunocastration is to be introduced in Norwegian pig production. Castration without anaesthesia was characterized as completely unacceptable.
从三个深入的焦点小组研究和一个关于消费者对仔猪去势和替代方法的态度的网络研究可以得出结论,挪威消费者对目前使用局部麻醉进行去势的做法感到满意。他们接受去势是防止肉中猪腥味的必要手段,从而确保肉的质量。即使使用麻醉进行去势不是完美的解决方案,但它被认为是足够的,消费者也不要求替代品。大多数消费者对免疫去势持怀疑态度。这种怀疑主要基于对肉中残留和对消费者未知的长期后果的担忧。另一方面,对挪威监管机构的信心是相当大的,即使免疫去势要引入挪威的养猪生产,这也可能有助于维持购买习惯。没有麻醉的去势被认为是完全不可接受的。