Aluwé Marijke, Heyrman Evert, Almeida João M, Babol Jakub, Battacone Gianni, Čítek Jaroslav, Font I Furnols Maria, Getya Andriy, Karolyi Danijel, Kostyra Eliza, Kress Kevin, Kušec Goran, Mörlein Daniel, Semenova Anastasia, Škrlep Martin, Stoyanchev Todor, Tomašević Igor, Tudoreanu Liliana, Van Son Maren, Żakowska-Biemans Sylwia, Zamaratskaia Galia, Van den Broeke Alice, Egea Macarena
Flanders Research Institute for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (ILVO), Animal Sciences Unit, 9090 Melle, Belgium.
Instituto Nacional de Investigação Agrária e Veterinária (INIAV), Quinta da Fonte Boa, 2005-048 Vale de Santarém, Portugal.
Animals (Basel). 2020 Sep 28;10(10):1758. doi: 10.3390/ani10101758.
Surgical castration of piglets without pain relief is still common practice in many countries. Possible alternatives for surgical castration are application of pain relief or anaesthesia or production of boars (entire males) and immunocastrates. Each of these alternatives faces advantages and disadvantages which may result in different citizen attitudes and consumers acceptability. Understanding which practice is acceptable to whom and why may further stimulate implementation. Consumer ( = 3251) and stakeholder ( = 1027) attitudes towards surgical castration without pain relief, surgical castration with anaesthesia, immunocastration, and production of boars were surveyed from April to June 2020 via an online questionnaire in 16 countries (>175 respondents per country). Surgical castration without pain relief was separated from each of the alternatives due to animal welfare and showed the lowest acceptability (32%). Within the alternatives, a further partitioning between the alternatives was based on perceived quality and food safety, with an acceptance of 85% for applying anaesthesia, 71% for immunocastration, and 49% for boar production. Differences depending on professional involvement and familiarity with agriculture could be observed, mainly for the acceptance of surgical castration without anaesthesia, immunocastration, and boars. Castration with anaesthesia was highly accepted by all types of respondents.
在许多国家,不对仔猪进行止痛处理的手术阉割仍是常见做法。手术阉割的可能替代方法包括应用止痛措施或麻醉,或生产公猪(完整雄性)以及免疫去势猪。这些替代方法各有优缺点,这可能导致不同的民众态度和消费者接受度。了解哪种做法为谁所接受以及原因,可能会进一步促进相关措施的实施。2020年4月至6月,通过在线问卷对16个国家(每个国家超过175名受访者)的消费者(=3251人)和利益相关者(=1027人)对不进行止痛处理的手术阉割、麻醉下的手术阉割、免疫去势和公猪生产的态度进行了调查。由于动物福利问题,不进行止痛处理的手术阉割与其他替代方法区分开来,其接受度最低(32%)。在替代方法中,根据感知质量和食品安全对替代方法进行了进一步划分,麻醉应用的接受度为85%,免疫去势为71%,公猪生产为49%。可以观察到因专业参与程度和对农业的熟悉程度而产生的差异,主要体现在对无麻醉手术阉割、免疫去势和公猪的接受度上。麻醉下的阉割为各类受访者高度接受。