Hötzel Maria José, Yunes Maria Cristina, Vandresen Bianca, Albernaz-Gonçalves Rita, Woodroffe Raphaela E
Laboratório de Etologia Aplicada e Bem-Estar Animal, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Rod. Admar Gonzaga 1346, Itacorubi, Florianópolis 88034-001, Brazil.
Instituto Federal Catarinense, Campus Santa Rosa do Sul, Santa Rosa do Sul, SC 88965-000, Brazil.
Animals (Basel). 2020 Oct 8;10(10):1826. doi: 10.3390/ani10101826.
We explored the attitudes of Brazilians towards different methods to deal with boar taint in pork (surgical castration without pain control, SC; surgical castration with pain control, SC+PC; immunocastration, IC; raising entire males, EM). Two surveys (Sv1, = 441 and Sv2, = 768) containing closed and open questions were conducted. Nearly 70% of Sv1 and Sv2 participants were unaware that meat of entire males may have boar taint and that SC is widely used in pig production in Brazil. In Sv1, acceptability of SC+PC (63%) and IC (53%) was greater than of SC (15%). In Sv2, acceptability of IC (55%) and EM (52%) was greater than of SC (18%). Open-ended responses indicated that participants objected to inflicting pain to pigs to attain a production goal, and were concerned with organoleptic traits and risks of exogenous residues in pork. Participants' views regarding the potential increases in the cost of meat due to adoption of alternative methods varied; some argued that avoiding pain justifies an increase in the price of pork and others that this would impact especially lower income citizens. Our findings indicate that participants opposed surgical castration without pain control, and supported alternative methods. However, the concern with potential risks of presence of residues in meat, expressed by a few participants, may need to be addressed among consumers.
我们探究了巴西人对猪肉中不同公猪膻味处理方法的态度(无疼痛控制的手术阉割,SC;有疼痛控制的手术阉割,SC+PC;免疫去势,IC;饲养完整雄性猪,EM)。我们进行了两项调查(Sv1,n = 441;Sv2,n = 768),其中包含封闭式和开放式问题。Sv1和Sv2中近70%的参与者不知道完整雄性猪的肉可能有公猪膻味,也不知道SC在巴西的生猪生产中被广泛使用。在Sv1中,SC+PC(63%)和IC(53%)的可接受性高于SC(15%)。在Sv2中,IC(55%)和EM(52%)的可接受性高于SC(18%)。开放式回答表明,参与者反对为实现生产目标而给猪造成痛苦,并关注猪肉的感官特性和外源残留物风险。参与者对于因采用替代方法而导致肉类成本可能增加的看法各不相同;一些人认为避免痛苦可以证明猪肉价格上涨是合理的,而另一些人则认为这将对低收入公民产生特别影响。我们的研究结果表明,参与者反对无疼痛控制的手术阉割,并支持替代方法。然而,少数参与者表达的对肉类中可能存在残留物潜在风险的担忧,可能需要在消费者中加以解决。