Laboratory for Health Protection Research, RIVM, Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
Eur Addict Res. 2010;16(4):202-7. doi: 10.1159/000317249. Epub 2010 Jul 2.
Drug policy makers continuously face a changing pattern of drug use, i.e. new drugs appear on the market, the popularity of certain drugs changes or drugs are used in another way or another combination. For legislative purposes, drugs have mostly been classified according to their addictive potency. Such classifications, however, lack a scientific basis. The present study describes the results of a risk assessment study where 19 recreational drugs (17 illicit drugs plus alcohol and tobacco) used in the Netherlands have been ranked by a Dutch expert panel according to their harm based on the scientific state of the art. The study applies a similar approach as recently applied by Nutt et al. [Lancet 2007;369:1047-1053], so that the results of both studies could be compared. The harm indicators scored are acute and chronic toxicity, addictive potency and social harm. The aim of this study is to evaluate whether the legal classification of drugs in the Netherlands corresponds with the ranking of the drugs according to their science-based ranking of harm. Based on the results, recommendations are formulated about the legal classification of recreational drugs at national and international level which serves a rational approach for drug control.
药物政策制定者不断面临着不断变化的药物使用模式,即新的药物出现在市场上,某些药物的流行程度发生变化,或者药物以另一种方式或另一种组合使用。出于立法目的,药物主要根据其成瘾效力进行分类。然而,这种分类缺乏科学依据。本研究描述了一项风险评估研究的结果,该研究由荷兰专家小组根据基于科学现状的危害对 19 种在荷兰使用的娱乐性药物(17 种非法药物加上酒精和烟草)进行了排名。该研究采用了 Nutt 等人最近应用的类似方法[柳叶刀 2007;369:1047-1053],以便可以比较两项研究的结果。评分的危害指标包括急性和慢性毒性、成瘾效力和社会危害。本研究旨在评估荷兰的毒品法律分类是否与根据危害的科学排名对毒品的排名相对应。基于这些结果,制定了关于娱乐性药物在国家和国际层面的法律分类的建议,为药物管制提供了合理的方法。