• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Redefining the goals of national drug policy: recommendations from a working group.重新定义国家药物政策目标:一个工作组的建议
Am J Public Health. 1995 Aug;85(8 Pt 1):1059-63. doi: 10.2105/ajph.85.8_pt_1.1059.
2
The analysis of policy: understanding the process of policy development.政策分析:理解政策制定过程。
Addiction. 1996 Sep;91(9):1265-70.
3
Coke and smack at the drugstore: harm reductive drug legalization: an alternative to a criminalization society.药店售卖可卡因和海洛因:减少危害的毒品合法化:刑事定罪社会的一种替代方案
Cornell J Law Public Policy. 2006 Summer;15(3):619-64.
4
Illegal drug use and public policy.非法药物使用与公共政策。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2002 Mar-Apr;21(2):134-45. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.21.2.134.
5
Dutch drug policy: a model for America?荷兰的毒品政策:美国的一个范例?
J Health Soc Policy. 1997;8(3):1-15. doi: 10.1300/J045v08n03_01.
6
Public policy statement on national drug policy. American Society of Addiction Medicine.关于国家药物政策的公共政策声明。美国成瘾医学协会。
J Addict Dis. 1994;13(4):231-4.
7
Harm reduction in Tanzania: an urgent need for multisectoral intervention.坦桑尼亚的减少伤害:多部门干预的迫切需求。
Int J Drug Policy. 2007 May;18(3):155-9. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2007.05.001. Epub 2007 Jun 6.
8
Statement on national drug policy. College on problems of drug dependence.关于国家毒品政策的声明。药物依赖问题学会。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 1997 Jul 25;47(1):63-71. doi: 10.1016/s0376-8716(97)00068-9.
9
Drug policy by analogy: well, it's like this..类推的毒品政策:嗯,是这样的……
Psychiatr Serv. 2003 Nov;54(11):1455-6. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.54.11.1455.
10
Tobacco and alcohol should be classed as dangerous drugs.烟草和酒精应被归类为危险毒品。
BMJ. 2006 Aug 5;333(7562):275. doi: 10.1136/bmj.333.7562.275.

引用本文的文献

1
Tobacco Harm Reduction as a Path to Restore Trust in Tobacco Control.减少烟草危害,重拾对烟草控制的信任。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 May 22;18(11):5560. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18115560.
2
Why the war on drugs in sport will never be won.为何体育界的反兴奋剂之战永远无法取胜。
Harm Reduct J. 2015 Nov 10;12:53. doi: 10.1186/s12954-015-0087-5.
3
The validity of reporting willingness to use a supervised injecting facility on subsequent program use among people who use injection drugs.报告使用监督注射设施的意愿在随后使用注射毒品人群中的有效性。
Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2012 Jan;38(1):55-62. doi: 10.3109/00952990.2011.600389. Epub 2011 Aug 11.
4
The Strategic Dialogue on Tobacco Harm Reduction: a vision and blueprint for action in the US.美国烟草减害战略对话:愿景与行动蓝图
Tob Control. 2009 Aug;18(4):324-32. doi: 10.1136/tc.2008.027318. Epub 2009 Feb 24.
5
Globalisation of anti-doping: the reverse side of the medal.反兴奋剂的全球化:奖牌的另一面。
BMJ. 2008 Jul 4;337(7661):a584. doi: 10.1136/bmj.a584.
6
Recent advances in the treatment of opiate addiction.阿片类药物成瘾治疗的最新进展。
Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2004 Oct;6(5):339-46. doi: 10.1007/s11920-004-0020-1.
7
Is a rational, national drug policy possible?合理的国家药物政策是否可行?
Am J Public Health. 1996 Jan;86(1):115. doi: 10.2105/ajph.86.1.115.

本文引用的文献

1
A 24-year follow-up of California narcotics addicts.
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1993 Jul;50(7):577-84. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1993.01820190079008.
2
Explaining the recent decline in marijuana use: differentiating the effects of perceived risks, disapproval, and general lifestyle factors.
J Health Soc Behav. 1988 Mar;29(1):92-112.
3
Dutch policy on the management of drug-related problems.
Br J Addict. 1989 Feb;84(2):211-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.1989.tb00571.x.
4
Estimates of economic costs of alcohol and drug abuse and mental illness, 1985 and 1988.1985年和1988年酒精和药物滥用及精神疾病的经济成本估算。
Public Health Rep. 1991 May-Jun;106(3):280-92.
5
Needle exchange or needless exchange? The state of the debate.针头交换还是无需交换?辩论现状。
Infect Agents Dis. 1992 Apr;1(2):92-8.

重新定义国家药物政策目标:一个工作组的建议

Redefining the goals of national drug policy: recommendations from a working group.

作者信息

Reuter P, Caulkins J P

机构信息

RAND Corporation, Drug Policy Research Center, Santa Monica, CA 90407-2138, USA.

出版信息

Am J Public Health. 1995 Aug;85(8 Pt 1):1059-63. doi: 10.2105/ajph.85.8_pt_1.1059.

DOI:10.2105/ajph.85.8_pt_1.1059
PMID:7625496
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1615810/
Abstract

This paper discusses what the goals of national drug policy have been and suggests an alternative set of goals. The past emphasis on use reduction is found wanting. Total harm related to drugs can be viewed as the product of use and harm per use. Thus, reducing use usually serves to reduce harm. However, in some cases, use reduction programs may increase harm per use so much that they increase overall harm even as they succeed in reducing use. Hence, use reduction goals can be usefully augmented with the explicit objective of reducing the total harm created by the production, distribution, consumption, and control of drugs. Numerous programmatic recommendations flow from this approach.

摘要

本文讨论了国家毒品政策的目标是什么,并提出了一套可供选择的目标。过去对减少毒品使用的强调被发现存在不足。与毒品相关的总体危害可被视为使用量与每次使用的危害的乘积。因此,减少使用通常有助于减少危害。然而,在某些情况下,减少使用的项目可能会使每次使用的危害增加如此之多,以至于即使它们成功减少了使用量,总体危害仍会增加。因此,减少毒品使用目标可以通过明确减少毒品生产、分销、消费和管制所造成的总体危害这一目标来得到有益的补充。这种方法产生了许多方案性建议。