• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

烟草及相关产品风险评估的方法学途径

Methodological Approaches for Risk Assessment of Tobacco and Related Products.

作者信息

Staal Yvonne C M, Bos Peter M J, Talhout Reinskje

机构信息

National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, P.O. Box 1, 3720 BA Bilthoven, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Toxics. 2022 Aug 24;10(9):491. doi: 10.3390/toxics10090491.

DOI:10.3390/toxics10090491
PMID:36136456
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9505557/
Abstract

Health risk assessment of tobacco and related products (TRPs) is highly challenging due to the variety in products, even within the product class, the complex mixture of components in the emission and the variety of user behaviour. In this paper, we summarize methods that can be used to assess the health risks associated with the use of TRPs. The choice of methods to be used and the data needed are dependent on the aim. Risk assessment can be used to identify the emission components of highest health concern. Alternatively, risk assessment methods can be used to determine the absolute risk of a TRP, which is the health risk of a product, not related to other products, or to determine the relative risk of a TRP, which is the health risk of a TRP compared to, for example, a cigarette. Generally, health risk assessment can be based on the effects of the complete mixture (whole smoke) or based on the (added) effects of individual components. Data requirements are dependent on the method used, but most methods require substantial data on identity and quantity of components in emissions and on the hazards of these components. Especially for hazards, only limited data are available. Currently, due to a lack of suitable data, quantitative risk assessment methods cannot be used to inform regulation.

摘要

由于产品种类繁多,即使在同一产品类别内,排放物中成分的复杂混合以及用户行为的多样性,烟草及相关产品(TRPs)的健康风险评估极具挑战性。在本文中,我们总结了可用于评估与使用TRPs相关的健康风险的方法。所使用方法的选择以及所需数据取决于目标。风险评估可用于识别最受健康关注的排放成分。或者,风险评估方法可用于确定TRP的绝对风险,即产品的健康风险,与其他产品无关,或用于确定TRP的相对风险,即TRP与例如香烟相比的健康风险。一般来说,健康风险评估可以基于完整混合物(全烟雾)的影响,也可以基于单个成分的(附加)影响。数据要求取决于所使用的方法,但大多数方法需要关于排放物中成分的身份和数量以及这些成分危害的大量数据。特别是对于危害,可用数据有限。目前,由于缺乏合适的数据,定量风险评估方法无法用于为监管提供信息。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1210/9505557/d63079906c74/toxics-10-00491-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1210/9505557/d63079906c74/toxics-10-00491-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1210/9505557/d63079906c74/toxics-10-00491-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Methodological Approaches for Risk Assessment of Tobacco and Related Products.烟草及相关产品风险评估的方法学途径
Toxics. 2022 Aug 24;10(9):491. doi: 10.3390/toxics10090491.
2
The effect of tobacco ingredients on smoke chemistry. Part I: Flavourings and additives.烟草成分对烟雾化学的影响。第一部分:调味剂和添加剂。
Food Chem Toxicol. 2004;42 Suppl:S3-37. doi: 10.1016/S0278-6915(03)00189-3.
3
Assessment of tobacco heating product THP1.0. Part 9: The placement of a range of next-generation products on an emissions continuum relative to cigarettes via pre-clinical assessment studies.加热不燃烧烟草制品 THP1.0 评估. 第 9 部分:通过临床前评估研究,将一系列下一代产品相对于香烟在排放连续体上的定位。
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2018 Mar;93:92-104. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2017.10.001. Epub 2017 Oct 25.
4
Quantitative proteomics analysis using 2D-PAGE to investigate the effects of cigarette smoke and aerosol of a prototypic modified risk tobacco product on the lung proteome in C57BL/6 mice.使用二维聚丙烯酰胺凝胶电泳进行定量蛋白质组学分析,以研究香烟烟雾和一种原型改良风险烟草产品的气溶胶对C57BL/6小鼠肺蛋白质组的影响。
J Proteomics. 2016 Aug 11;145:237-245. doi: 10.1016/j.jprot.2016.05.037. Epub 2016 Jun 5.
5
Assessment of priority tobacco additives per the requirements of the EU Tobacco Products Directive (2014/40/EU): Part 1: Background, approach, and summary of findings.根据欧盟烟草制品指令(2014/40/EU)的要求对优先烟草添加剂进行评估:第 1 部分:背景、方法和研究结果总结。
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2019 Jun;104:84-97. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2019.02.011. Epub 2019 Feb 21.
6
Cytotoxic effects of heated tobacco products (HTP) on human bronchial epithelial cells.加热烟草制品(HTP)对人支气管上皮细胞的细胞毒性作用。
Tob Control. 2018 Nov;27(Suppl 1):s26-s29. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2018-054317. Epub 2018 Sep 5.
7
Hazardous compounds in tobacco smoke.烟草烟雾中的有害化合物。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2011 Feb;8(2):613-28. doi: 10.3390/ijerph8020613. Epub 2011 Feb 23.
8
Integrating chemical, toxicological and clinical research to assess the potential of reducing health risks associated with cigarette smoking through reducing toxicant emissions.整合化学、毒理学和临床研究,评估通过减少有毒物质排放降低与吸烟相关健康风险的潜力。
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2018 Jun;95:102-114. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2018.03.005. Epub 2018 Mar 9.
9
Risk assessment of components in tobacco smoke and e-cigarette aerosols: a pragmatic choice of dose metrics.烟草烟雾和电子烟气溶胶成分的风险评估:剂量指标的实用选择。
Inhal Toxicol. 2021 Feb;33(3):81-95. doi: 10.1080/08958378.2021.1909678. Epub 2021 Apr 20.
10
Analysis of complex mixtures--cigarette smoke.复杂混合物分析——香烟烟雾
Exp Toxicol Pathol. 2005 Jul;57 Suppl 1:43-73. doi: 10.1016/j.etp.2005.05.010.

引用本文的文献

1
Emissions from conventional and electronic waterpipes relative to cigarettes and a heated tobacco product.传统水烟管和电子烟管相对于香烟及加热烟草制品的排放物。
Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 30;15(1):14176. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-90721-w.
2
Novel DNA methylation changes in mouse lungs associated with chronic smoking.与慢性吸烟相关的小鼠肺部新型DNA甲基化变化
Epigenetics. 2024 Dec;19(1):2322386. doi: 10.1080/15592294.2024.2322386. Epub 2024 Mar 4.
3
Advantages and Disadvantages of Electronic Cigarettes.电子烟的优缺点。

本文引用的文献

1
Challenges in Predicting the Change in the Cumulative Exposure of New Tobacco and Related Products Based on Emissions and Toxicity Dose-Response Data.基于排放和毒性剂量反应数据预测新型烟草和相关产品累积暴露量变化的挑战。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 24;19(17):10528. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191710528.
2
The influence of exposure approaches to lung epithelial barrier models to assess engineered nanomaterial hazard.暴露方法对肺上皮屏障模型评估工程纳米材料危害的影响。
Nanotoxicology. 2022 Feb;16(1):114-134. doi: 10.1080/17435390.2022.2051627. Epub 2022 Mar 27.
3
Conceptual model for the evaluation of attractiveness, addictiveness and toxicity of tobacco and related products: The example of JUUL e-cigarettes.
Toxics. 2023 Jan 11;11(1):66. doi: 10.3390/toxics11010066.
用于评估烟草和相关产品吸引力、成瘾性和毒性的概念模型:以 JUUL 电子烟为例。
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2021 Dec;127:105077. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2021.105077. Epub 2021 Nov 5.
4
The Chemical Complexity of e-Cigarette Aerosols Compared With the Smoke From a Tobacco Burning Cigarette.电子烟烟雾与燃烧烟草香烟烟雾相比的化学复杂性。
Front Chem. 2021 Sep 30;9:743060. doi: 10.3389/fchem.2021.743060. eCollection 2021.
5
Development of updated RfD and RfC values for medium carbon range aromatic and aliphatic total petroleum hydrocarbon fractions.开发更新的 RfD 和 RfC 值,用于中碳范围芳烃和脂肪族总石油烃馏分。
J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2021 Dec;71(12):1555-1567. doi: 10.1080/10962247.2021.1974123. Epub 2021 Sep 23.
6
Risk assessment of components in tobacco smoke and e-cigarette aerosols: a pragmatic choice of dose metrics.烟草烟雾和电子烟气溶胶成分的风险评估:剂量指标的实用选择。
Inhal Toxicol. 2021 Feb;33(3):81-95. doi: 10.1080/08958378.2021.1909678. Epub 2021 Apr 20.
7
Integrating biokinetics and in vitro studies to evaluate developmental neurotoxicity induced by chlorpyrifos in human iPSC-derived neural stem cells undergoing differentiation towards neuronal and glial cells.将生物动力学和体外研究相结合,评估在向神经元和神经胶质细胞分化的人诱导多能干细胞中,氯吡硫磷引起的发育神经毒性。
Reprod Toxicol. 2020 Dec;98:174-188. doi: 10.1016/j.reprotox.2020.09.010. Epub 2020 Oct 1.
8
Risk Assessment of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substance Mixtures: A Relative Potency Factor Approach.全氟和多氟烷基物质混合物的风险评估:相对效力因子方法。
Environ Toxicol Chem. 2021 Mar;40(3):859-870. doi: 10.1002/etc.4835. Epub 2020 Sep 8.
9
Guidance on harmonised methodologies for human health, animal health and ecological risk assessment of combined exposure to multiple chemicals.关于多种化学品联合暴露对人类健康、动物健康和生态风险评估的统一方法指南。
EFSA J. 2019 Mar 25;17(3):e05634. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5634. eCollection 2019 Mar.
10
A Method for Comparing the Impact on Carcinogenicity of Tobacco Products: A Case Study on Heated Tobacco Versus Cigarettes.一种比较烟草制品致癌影响的方法:以加热烟草与香烟为例的案例研究。
Risk Anal. 2020 Jul;40(7):1355-1366. doi: 10.1111/risa.13482. Epub 2020 May 1.