Suppr超能文献

[采用心尖入路的连续波多普勒技术无创测定心输出量]

[Noninvasive determination of cardiac output by continuous wave Doppler technique using apical approach].

作者信息

Hashimoto M

机构信息

Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Hokkaido University School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan.

出版信息

Hokkaido Igaku Zasshi. 1991 Mar;66(2):170-8.

PMID:2060905
Abstract

The accuracy of a new method for measuring cardiac output with continuous wave Doppler technique from the cardiac apex (CWa) was studied in comparison with two conventional methods, pulsed Doppler technique using apical approach (PWa) and continuous wave Doppler technique using suprasternal approach (CWs). Study population consisted of 25 patients whose cardiac output had been determined by thermodilution method. None of the patients had aortic valve disease, significant tricuspid regurgitation or intracardiac shunt. Aortic flow velocity curves were recorded with the above three Doppler techniques and the cross-sectional area of the aortic root was measured by two-dimensional echocardiogram at mid-systole. Cardiac output (CO) by each Doppler technique was computed using the following equation: CO = aortic cross-sectional area x systolic velocity integral x heart rate. Cardiac output by CWa had better correlation with thermal output value than those by PWa and CWs (r = 0.94, r = 0.85, r = 0.59, respectively). Outputs by PWa and CWs tended to be underestimated compared with thermodilution output. Interobserver difference was smaller in CWa than in PWa and in CWs (4.5%, 7.7%, 6.6%, respectively). Thus, our new method would appear to be accurate and useful in estimating cardiac output, and so may be applied in its case of seriously ill patients.

摘要

采用心尖连续波多普勒技术(CWa)测量心输出量的一种新方法的准确性,与两种传统方法进行了比较研究,这两种传统方法分别是经心尖途径的脉冲多普勒技术(PWa)和经胸骨上窝途径的连续波多普勒技术(CWs)。研究对象包括25例已通过热稀释法测定心输出量的患者。所有患者均无主动脉瓣疾病、明显的三尖瓣反流或心内分流。采用上述三种多普勒技术记录主动脉流速曲线,并在收缩中期通过二维超声心动图测量主动脉根部的横截面积。每种多普勒技术的心输出量(CO)使用以下公式计算:CO = 主动脉横截面积×收缩期速度积分×心率。与PWa和CWs相比,CWa的心输出量与热稀释法测量值的相关性更好(分别为r = 0.94、r = 0.85、r = 0.59)。与热稀释法测量值相比,PWa和CWs的心输出量往往被低估。CWa的观察者间差异小于PWa和CWs(分别为4.5%、7.7%、6.6%)。因此,我们的新方法在估计心输出量方面似乎准确且有用,可应用于重症患者。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验