[Noninvasive measurement of cardiac output using two-dimensional Doppler echocardiography and analysis of sources of error].

The purpose of this study was (1) to analyze the factors responsible for errors in the two-dimensional Doppler echographic measurements of cardiac output (C.O.) and (2) to establish a noninvasive method for measuring C.O. The subjects were 50 cardiac patients who had neither aortic valve disease nor intracardiac shunts. The C.O. was calculated using the following formula: C.O. (l/min) = mean flow velocity (cm/sec) x pi(aortic ring diameter/2)2 (cm2) x 60/10(3) Left ventricular ejection flow velocity was recorded in the center of the aortic ring from the apical approach. Mean velocity was calculated by integration of instantaneous mean velocity in the ejection phase divided by the cardiac cycle length, and was corrected by the Doppler incident angle. The inner diameter of the aortic ring was measured in the parasternal long-axis view at the time of the maximum ejection flow velocity. The following results were obtained: 1. Sources of error in the measurement of cardiac output. 1) Accuracy of instantaneous mean velocity calculating circuit: This calculating circuit was accurate in model experiments using pulsatile flow. 2) Effect of high-pass filter: In model circuits, application of high-pass filter overestimated flow velocity. The higher the cut-off frequency of the high-pass filter, the larger the overestimation. This was probably due to the parabolic flow velocity profile in the circuit. 3) Flow velocity profile in the aortic ring: The flow velocity profile seemed to be flat in the aortic ring except near the anterior aortic wall. Therefore, the effect of the high-pass filter was considered to be negligible in case of clinical application. 4) The effects of shift and size of sample volume: The location of sample volume relative to the aortic valve ring shifted about 7 mm during systole. However, the shift and size of sample volume seemed to have little effect on the measured C.O., because the flow velocity profile was nearly flat in the aortic ring. 5) Ultrasound beam incident angle: From a practical viewpoint, it was necessary to set an incident angle of less than 50 degrees for minimizing the error. We were able to set the angle within 50 degrees in all but one of patients. 6) Diameter of the aortic ring: Two-dimensional echographic measurement of the aortic ring diameter was not so accurate; it seemed to become a major source of error in the calculation of C.O.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)