Suppr超能文献

新型内皮角膜移植术、白内障超声乳化吸除术及人工晶状体植入三联手术:与传统三联手术的比较

New endothelial keratoplasty, phacoemulsification, and intraocular lens implantation triple procedure: comparison with conventional triple procedure.

作者信息

Padmanabhan Prema, Warade Sonali Kisan, Sejpal Kunjal

机构信息

Medical and Vision Research Foundation, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.

出版信息

J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010 Jul;36(7):1142-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.01.022.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare the clinical outcomes of a new triple procedure comprising endothelial keratoplasty, phacoemulsification, and intraocular lens (IOL) implantation and a conventional triple procedure comprising penetrating keratoplasty, extracapsular cataract extraction, and IOL implantation.

SETTING

Cornea Services, Medical Research Foundation, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.

METHODS

In this prospective nonrandomized study, the new triple procedure was performed in eyes with predominant endothelial dysfunction and coexisting cataract and the conventional triple procedure, in eyes with opacities affecting other layers of the cornea. Outcome measures were intraoperative and postoperative complications, 3-month postoperative distance visual acuity, refractive status, mean corneal power, corneal topography, and endothelial cell loss. The outcomes in the 2 groups were compared.

RESULTS

The new procedure group comprised 54 eyes and the conventional procedure group, 26 eyes. All grafts in both groups were clear 3 months postoperatively. The IOL was fixated in the capsular bag in all eyes in the new procedure group and 23% of eyes in the conventional procedure group. Postoperatively, persistent epithelial defects, uveitis, glaucoma, and posterior capsule opacification were significantly more frequent in the conventional procedure group. Visual acuity was significantly better and the postoperative refractive status more predictable in the new procedure group. Endothelial cell loss was greater in the new procedure group than in the conventional group, although the difference was not statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

The new triple procedure was safer than the conventional triple procedure and resulted in better visual outcomes, a more predictable refractive error, a smoother corneal contour, and a tectonically stronger globe.

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.

摘要

目的

比较一种新的三联手术(包括内皮角膜移植术、超声乳化白内障吸除术和人工晶状体植入术)与传统三联手术(包括穿透性角膜移植术、囊外白内障摘除术和人工晶状体植入术)的临床效果。

设置

印度泰米尔纳德邦金奈医学研究基金会角膜服务部。

方法

在这项前瞻性非随机研究中,新的三联手术用于主要存在内皮功能障碍且合并白内障的眼睛,传统三联手术用于角膜其他层出现混浊的眼睛。观察指标包括术中及术后并发症、术后3个月的远视力、屈光状态、平均角膜屈光力、角膜地形图以及内皮细胞丢失情况。比较两组的结果。

结果

新手术组有54只眼,传统手术组有26只眼。两组所有移植片在术后3个月均保持透明。新手术组所有眼睛的人工晶状体均固定于囊袋内,传统手术组有23%的眼睛如此。术后,传统手术组持续性上皮缺损、葡萄膜炎、青光眼和后囊膜混浊的发生率明显更高。新手术组的视力明显更好,术后屈光状态更可预测。新手术组的内皮细胞丢失比传统组更多,尽管差异无统计学意义。

结论

新的三联手术比传统三联手术更安全,视觉效果更好,屈光不正更可预测,角膜轮廓更平滑,眼球结构更坚固。

财务披露

没有作者对文中提及的任何材料或方法拥有财务或专利权益。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验