Wittorf Andreas, Jakobi Ute E, Bannert Kerstin K, Bechdolf Andreas, Müller Bernhard W, Sartory Gudrun, Wagner Michael, Wiedemann Georg, Wölwer Wolfgang, Herrlich Jutta, Buchkremer Gerhard, Klingberg Stefan
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
J Nerv Ment Dis. 2010 Jul;198(7):478-85. doi: 10.1097/NMD.0b013e3181e4f526.
We examined whether the cognitive dispute of psychotic symptoms has a negative impact on the course of the therapeutic alliance. Sixty-seven patients with persistent psychotic symptoms received either cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) or supportive therapy. Questionnaire-based alliance ratings were repeatedly obtained throughout the course of therapy. Patient and therapist alliance ratings were examined separately. Data analyses comprised repeated measurement analyses of variance and cluster analytic procedures. Neither patient nor therapist alliance ratings showed a differential course throughout the treatments. This was despite the implementation of disputing strategies in later stages of CBT. Irrespective of the treatment condition a cluster with a positive alliance rating and a cluster with a poorer rating were found for therapist and patient ratings, respectively. Baseline symptoms and insight differentiated between the types of clusters. In conclusion, CBT-specific interventions that challenge psychotic symptoms do not necessarily negatively influence the course of the alliance.
我们研究了对精神病性症状的认知辩驳是否会对治疗联盟的进程产生负面影响。67名有持续性精神病性症状的患者接受了认知行为疗法(CBT)或支持性疗法。在整个治疗过程中反复获取基于问卷的联盟评分。分别对患者和治疗师的联盟评分进行了检查。数据分析包括重复测量方差分析和聚类分析程序。在整个治疗过程中,患者和治疗师的联盟评分均未显示出差异。尽管在CBT的后期实施了辩驳策略,但仍是如此。无论治疗条件如何,治疗师和患者评分分别发现了一个联盟评分为正的聚类和一个评分较差的聚类。基线症状和洞察力在聚类类型之间存在差异。总之,挑战精神病性症状的CBT特异性干预措施不一定会对联盟进程产生负面影响。