Robert F. Wagner Graduate School and Division of General Medicine, NYU Medical School, New York University, New York, New York, United States of America.
PLoS Med. 2010 Jun 29;7(6):e1000297. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000297.
Pay-for-performance is an increasingly popular approach to improving health care quality, and the US government will soon implement pay-for-performance in hospitals nationwide. Yet hospital capacity to perform (and improve performance) likely depends on local resources. In this study, we quantify the association between hospital performance and local economic and human resources, and describe possible implications of pay-for-performance for socioeconomic equity.
We applied county-level measures of local economic and workforce resources to a national sample of US hospitals (n = 2,705), during the period 2004-2007. We analyzed performance for two common cardiac conditions (acute myocardial infarction [AMI] and heart failure [HF]), using process-of-care measures from the Hospital Quality Alliance [HQA], and isolated temporal trends and the contributions of individual resource dimensions on performance, using multivariable mixed models. Performance scores were translated into net scores for hospitals using the Performance Assessment Model, which has been suggested as a basis for reimbursement under Medicare's "Value-Based Purchasing" program. Our analyses showed that hospital performance is substantially associated with local economic and workforce resources. For example, for HF in 2004, hospitals located in counties with longstanding poverty had mean HQA composite scores of 73.0, compared with a mean of 84.1 for hospitals in counties without longstanding poverty (p<0.001). Hospitals located in counties in the lowest quartile with respect to college graduates in the workforce had mean HQA composite scores of 76.7, compared with a mean of 86.2 for hospitals in the highest quartile (p<0.001). Performance on AMI measures showed similar patterns. Performance improved generally over the study period. Nevertheless, by 2007--4 years after public reporting began--hospitals in locationally disadvantaged areas still lagged behind their locationally advantaged counterparts. This lag translated into substantially lower net scores under the Performance Assessment Model for hospital reimbursement.
Hospital performance on clinical process measures is associated with the quantity and quality of local economic and human resources. Medicare's hospital pay-for-performance program may exacerbate inequalities across regions, if implemented as currently proposed. Policymakers in the US and beyond may need to take into consideration the balance between greater efficiency through pay-for-performance and socioeconomic equity.
按绩效付费是提高医疗质量的一种日益流行的方法,美国政府即将在全国范围内的医院实施按绩效付费。然而,医院的执行能力(和提高绩效的能力)可能取决于当地的资源。在这项研究中,我们量化了医院绩效与当地经济和人力资源之间的关系,并描述了按绩效付费对社会经济公平性的可能影响。
我们将县级的地方经济和劳动力资源指标应用于 2004-2007 年期间美国全国范围内的医院样本(n=2705)。我们使用医院质量联盟(HQA)的治疗过程指标来分析两种常见的心脏疾病(急性心肌梗死[AMI]和心力衰竭[HF])的表现,使用多变量混合模型分析了个别资源维度对表现的趋势和贡献。我们使用绩效评估模型将绩效得分转换为医院的净得分,该模型已被提议作为医疗保险“基于价值的采购”计划下报销的基础。我们的分析表明,医院的绩效与当地的经济和劳动力资源密切相关。例如,在 2004 年,HF 方面,位于长期贫困县的医院的 HQA 综合评分平均为 73.0,而位于非长期贫困县的医院的平均得分为 84.1(p<0.001)。在劳动力中大学毕业生比例最低的县的医院的 HQA 综合评分平均为 76.7,而在劳动力中大学毕业生比例最高的县的医院的平均得分为 86.2(p<0.001)。AMI 测量的表现也呈现出类似的模式。研究期间,绩效总体上有所提高。然而,到 2007 年——即公开报告开始四年后——地理位置不利地区的医院仍落后于地理位置有利地区的医院。这一差距导致医院在绩效评估模型下的报销净得分大幅下降。
临床过程测量的医院绩效与当地经济和人力资源的数量和质量有关。如果按照目前的提议实施,医疗保险的医院按绩效付费计划可能会加剧区域间的不平等。美国和其他国家的政策制定者可能需要考虑在通过按绩效付费提高效率和社会经济公平性之间取得平衡。