IMS Health, London, UK.
Pharmacology. 2010;86(1):44-57. doi: 10.1159/000314690. Epub 2010 Jul 12.
A systematic review of the literature, in combination with a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing treatments with placebo, was conducted to provide an update on the clinical efficacy and safety of incretin-based medications in adult patients with type 2 diabetes.
A literature search (2000-2009) identified 38 placebo-controlled trials (phase II or later - parallel design) comparing exenatide (n = 8), liraglutide (n = 7), vildagliptin (n = 11) and sitagliptin (n = 12) with placebo. Outcomes were change from baseline in HbA(1c) and in weight, and the number of patient-reported hypoglycemic episodes. HbA(1c) and weight outcomes were analyzed as weighted mean differences (WMD), and the number of hypoglycemic episodes as relative risks (RR).
Patients receiving liraglutide showed greater reduction in HbA(1c) in comparison to placebo (WMD = -1.03, 95% confidence interval, CI = -1.16 to -0.90, p < 0.001) than those on sitagliptin (WMD = -0.79, 95% CI = -0.93 to -0.65, p < 0.001), exenatide (WMD = -0.75, 95% CI = -0.83 to -0.67, p < 0.001) or vildagliptin (WMD = -0.67, 95% CI = -0.83 to -0.52, p < 0.001). Weight was statistically significantly negatively associated with exenatide (WMD = -1.10, 95% CI = -1.32 to -0.87, p < 0.001) and positively associated with sitagliptin (WMD = 0.60, 95% CI = 0.33-0.87, p < 0.001) and vildagliptin (WMD = 0.56, 95% CI = 0.27-0.84, p < 0.001). The number of patient-reported hypoglycemic episodes was statistically significantly associated with the use of sitagliptin (RR = 2.56, 95% CI = 1.23-5.33, p = 0.01) and exenatide (RR = 2.40, 95% CI = 1.30-4.11, p = 0.002).
Incretin-based therapies are effective in glycemic control and also offer other advantages such as weight loss (exenatide and liraglutide). This may have an important impact on patient adherence to medication.
对文献进行系统回顾,并结合安慰剂对照随机临床试验的荟萃分析,以提供关于肠降血糖素类药物在成年 2 型糖尿病患者中的临床疗效和安全性的最新信息。
对 2000 年至 2009 年的文献进行检索,共确定了 38 项安慰剂对照试验(二期或更晚期-平行设计),比较艾塞那肽(n = 8)、利拉鲁肽(n = 7)、维格列汀(n = 11)和西他列汀(n = 12)与安慰剂的疗效。主要结局是基线 HbA1c 和体重的变化,以及患者报告的低血糖发作次数。HbA1c 和体重结果分析为加权均数差(WMD),低血糖发作次数分析为相对风险(RR)。
与接受西他列汀治疗的患者相比,接受利拉鲁肽治疗的患者 HbA1c 降低更显著(WMD = -1.03,95%置信区间,CI = -1.16 至 -0.90,p < 0.001),与接受西他列汀治疗的患者相比(WMD = -0.79,95%CI = -0.93 至 -0.65,p < 0.001)、艾塞那肽(WMD = -0.75,95%CI = -0.83 至 -0.67,p < 0.001)或维格列汀(WMD = -0.67,95%CI = -0.83 至 -0.52,p < 0.001)。体重与艾塞那肽呈显著负相关(WMD = -1.10,95%CI = -1.32 至 -0.87,p < 0.001),与西他列汀(WMD = 0.60,95%CI = 0.33-0.87,p < 0.001)和维格列汀(WMD = 0.56,95%CI = 0.27-0.84,p < 0.001)呈显著正相关。患者报告的低血糖发作次数与西他列汀(RR = 2.56,95%CI = 1.23-5.33,p = 0.01)和艾塞那肽(RR = 2.40,95%CI = 1.30-4.11,p = 0.002)的使用显著相关。
肠降血糖素类治疗在血糖控制方面有效,并且还具有体重减轻(艾塞那肽和利拉鲁肽)等其他优势。这可能对患者对药物的依从性产生重要影响。